Next up in Meet the Committee is Katie Ahern, one of our PG & ECR reps, who is based at UCC

 

KAHow did you end up where you are now?

I did a BA in English and Irish in University College Cork, during which I took a lot of American literature courses and discovered a lot of authors I’d not encountered before. This then led me to do a Masters in Twentieth-Century American Literature and Film, in the School of English. During my MA I read the novels of Anzia Yezierska and Edith Wharton, and fell down a research rabbit hole which brought me to do my PhD on both those authors.

Tell us a little bit about your current research interests?

My PhD thesis, ““All Night Long I Walked the Streets, Drunk with my Dreams”: A Comparative Study of Urban Space in Twentieth-Century American Literature” analyses American novels set in the urban environment to investigate marginalised identities and establish the ways in which neglected identities were conceived of by twentieth-century American writers.

Favourite book/film/album?

Any novel by Louise Erdrich.

Universities don’t exist. What job would you have instead?

A professional cookbook collector – for such a thing should exist.

Who would play you in the movie of your life?

Meryl Streep – because she’s played nearly everyone else.

How did you get involved with the IAAS?

I attended the IAAS PG symposium when I first started my PhD, discovered that it’s a great way to meet other people involved in American studies in Ireland, and was hooked by the idea that others understood the intellectual and emotional morass involved in doing research!

In an alternate universe to question 4, you have somehow ended up establishing your own university. What’s the motto?

“You should be writing.”

We’re all going to call around this evening. What’s for dinner?

Curry. Or else soup.

Who is your hero, academic or otherwise?

Dana Scully – despite aliens, inept bureaucrats and evil government forces interfering in her life, she gets stuff done.

Free space! You have about 200 words to plug something dear to your heart/announce plans to take over the universe/tell us about the grand plans you have as a member of the committee…

Calling all postgrads to join the ranks of the IAAS and make your views known!
The conferences and symposia are interesting, and a great way to meet other scholars in the area. I encourage everyone to think about joining the committee, or helping to run a conference. It looks good on the CV as well – proof that one can play well with others.

Next up in our Meet the Committee series is Kate Smyth, one of our Postgraduate and Early Career reps…

 

How did you end up where you are now?

I did my BA in English and Psychology at NUI Galway and an MA in Writing there, and then came to KS picTrinity to do the M.Phil in Literatures of the Americas. I did my dissertation on Toni Morrison, but was reading Alice Munro and Margaret Atwood at that time too. I took a couple of years out to work and teach English as a foreign language, and to figure out what my PhD research would look like. It took quite a bit of reading and note-making but I pursued my interest in Munro and Atwood, discovered Mavis Gallant, decided to focus on the short story form, and started my project in 2014. I’m about halfway through now, managed to get IRC funding, and things are trucking along pretty well.

Tell us a little bit about your current research interests?

I work on the short fiction of Gallant, Munro, and Atwood, focusing specifically on the post-war period, and on issues of belonging, identity, and gender in their stories. I’m interested in issues to do with home and place, as well as the social and cultural construction of identity and the ways in which this can change over time and through movement from one place to another.

Favourite book/film/album?

Mavis Gallant’s From the Fifteenth District / Lost in Translation / The Last Shadow Puppets, The Age of the Understatement

Universities don’t exist. What job would you have instead?

Professional dog minder

Who would play you in the movie of your life?

Judi Dench

How did you get involved with the IAAS?

Having attended a couple of the conferences, I was recruited to become an IAAS PG rep. And I’m glad I was because I’ve met some cool and interesting people as a result.

In an alternate universe to question 4, you have somehow ended up establishing your own university. What’s the motto?

“Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus”

We’re all going to call around this evening. What’s for dinner?

Burgers (I’ve gotten pretty good at making them).

Who is your hero, academic or otherwise?

Elif Shafak, Turkish writer and journalist.

Free space! You have about 200 words to plug something dear to your heart/announce plans to take over the universe/tell us about the grand plans you have as a member of the committee…

I highly encourage any postgrads interested in American studies to join the IAAS. We’re good craic and you can learn a lot and meet a lot of interesting people. It’s an important part of the postgrad process to include yourself in your academic community, and we welcome any and all postgrads to come along to events or give us a shout with questions. As for my grand future plans, right now I’m focussing on finishing this thesis chapter and trying not to get distracted by re-watching episodes of That 70’s Show.

Continuing our Meet the Committee series is the current EAAS rep Dr Philip McGowan. Philip is also the current President of the EAAS. Visit their website here to find out more about what they do.

 

 How did you end up where you are now? Pres PMcG

Well, after completing my PhD (1997) at Trinity College Dublin and seven years of working at Goldsmiths’ College in London (1998-2005), I was appointed by Queen’s University Belfast. Among the first thing I wanted to do here was to bring the annual IAAS conference to Queen’s, which we did in 2006 and again in 2011, by which time I had moved from being Secretary to the IAAS to being its Chair. I vacated this role in April 2016 at the AGM during our hugely successful IBAAS conference, again at Queen’s, and now find myself the President of the EAAS until 2020. So, you know, careful what you wish for and all that.

Tell us a little bit about your current research interests

I was hoping you might do this bit for me… Right now, when I get the moments, I am looking at Elizabeth Bishop’s poetry and how she surreptitiously (I believe) folds philosophy into her work. Poetry does seem to be taking up most of my time these days when it comes to research: I have other articles in process on John Berryman, Wallace Stevens and Mark Doty, but will also be pulling together another on F Scott Fitzgerald’s short stories from the 1930s for the F Scott Fitzgerald Review (most likely in 2017).

 Favourite book/film/album?

Too hard to narrow this down. I have loved William Maxwell’s fiction for quite some time now and still can’t quite understand why he has been so overlooked. Jack Lemmon’s performance in Save the Tiger (1973) makes that one of my favourite films. No idea about a favourite album: listening to The Wedding Present a lot again recently, and New Order’s Power, Corruption & Lies was the first album I bought and it still sounds brilliant 33 years on; so, an indie kid still at heart.

Universities don’t exist. What job would you have instead?

Inventing a university.

Who would play you in the movie of your life?

Americans regularly tell me I remind them of Edward Norton. So him, I guess.

 How did you get involved with the IAAS?

Stephen Matterson, my PhD supervisor, suggested I present at the annual conference in St Pat’s in Drumcondra in 1994 or 1995. So 21 or 22 years and counting now.

In an alternate universe to question 4, you have somehow ended up establishing your own university. What’s the motto?

Ha. Um, I guess something from Emerson – “Do not go where the path may lead; go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.” Or “What lies behind you and what lies in front of you pales in comparison to what lies inside of you.” These, of course, would be used provided Ron Callan can be this university’s permanent President.

We’re all going to call around this evening. What’s for dinner?

Curry

Who is your hero, academic or otherwise?

The person who resurrects Leeds United.

 Free space! You have about 200 words to plug something dear to your heart/announce plans to take over the universe/tell us about the grand plans you have as a member of the committee…

You should have asked me this 5 years ago… When I became Chair of the IAAS I was really keen to grow our membership numbers and when we hit the 100 member mark it was a real pleasure to see our late Treasurer, Tony Emmerson’s, smile at that fact. The IAAS is now tucked in among the middle membership associations in the EAAS – still nowhere near Germany’s 1100 members mind you, but if we can keep our membership numbers buoyant and between 100-150 I think we will be well set to support postgraduate and early career scholars for years to come. As President of EAAS I’ve set myself and the Officers and the European journal team some ambitious and challenging goals: relaunch the EAAS website and the EAAS journal in time for the next EAAS conference, in London in 2018; produce a fairer set of subscription rates in relation to postgraduate and concession members across all of the associations; look at how to support the smallest Associations to help them increase membership; look at how we collaborate with other American Studies associations internationally. So plenty to do, but all hopefully to the benefit of EAAS members.

Over the next few weeks, we’re going to introduce you to the members of the Executive Committee. First up is Dr Bernice Murphy!

     How did you end up where you are now? 

Murphy picAfter doing a BA in English and an MA in Modern Literary Studies at Queen’s University, Belfast, I was accepted for PhD study with Stephen Matterson at Trinity. My thesis focused on the work of Shirley Jackson, who was, at the time, a rather outrageously neglected figure (although this is thankfully no longer the case). I looked at her work from within the framework of the historical and cultural context of 1950s America, and it exposed me to a wide range of ideas and subject areas. I’d always been a pretty solid (though by no means exceptional) college student, but I realised pretty early on at TCD that something about the process of PhD writing and research really suited my inherently anti-social tendencies. In short: I wanted to keep on doing This Kind of Thing, if possible. With Stephen’s encouragement, I started work on my first book during the final year of my PhD, which was an edited collection of essays on Jackson (the first of its kind). I then spent almost three years in miserable post-PhD limbo, working as a TA and unsuccessfully applying for the kinds of academic jobs that require you to set aside a week to fill in the 40 page application form and then take six months to let you know you don’t have an interview. I was finally granted a reprieve when I won an IRCHSS Postdoctoral Fellowship, which allowed me to write my book The Suburban Gothic. Essentially, that fellowship made it possible for me to have a viable academic career – just as it was finishing up in 2008, a job as lecturer in Popular Literature opened up at TCD, and my skills and research interests were a good match (it’s actually still, to my knowledge, the only post of its kind in the world – I was fortunate to be in the right place, at the right time). I started my new job on the exact same day that Lehman Brothers bank collapsed. Little did I know then that it would be almost a decade before we had name brand-biros in the school stationery cupboard again (and even now, we have to share one between three of us).  But it’s all downhill from here!

     Tell us a little bit about your current research interests

My research so far has mainly focused on the study of place and space in American horror and gothic narratives, and I have published monographs about gothic suburbia, backwoods horror, and the highway horror film. However, over the last year or so, I have been working on a couple of projects related to popular literature in a more general sense: a text book that is intended to introduce undergraduate and postgraduate students to Key Concepts in Contemporary Popular Fiction, and, with Stephen Matterson, an edited collection featuring 20 essays on leading genre authors, called Twenty-First Century Popular Fiction (both forthcoming from Edinburgh University Press). After I get those finished, I intend to lie down in a darkened room for several months, and then gradually start work on the final instalment in my ‘places in the American Gothic’ series. I also have a couple of pretty cool article ideas I want to develop over the summer, though who knows what will become of them. It’s been a very busy couple of years writing, so I am really looking forward to being able to slow down a bit, and engaging in the kind of seemingly rather aimless background reading that so often leads to the accidental formulation of interesting ideas.

     Favourite book/film/album?

Book: We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson

Film: That’s a toss-up between Carrie, Notorious and the 1976 adaptation of Invasion of the Body Snatchers at the moment, though this list changes on a fortnightly basis.

Album:  Dated but true answer: Dummy by Portishead.  I almost cheered when ‘Sour Times’ was used to score a particularly on-the-nose scene in The People Versus O.J. Simpson.

     Universities don’t exist. What job would you have instead?

I would probably be an extremely inept secondary school English teacher who gets sacked for making age-inappropriate jokes about the suggestive similarities between Ed Gein and Boo Radley.

     Who would play you in the movie of your life?

That’s a tough one, but it comes down to a tie between Angela Lansbury and Eva Green. I feel that Lansbury would capture my quiet dignity and skill for amateur crime detection, whilst Green would convey my intermittent bouts of demonic possession with terrifying aplomb. I suggest they take alternate scenes, except for when portraying my lecturing style – then both of them should appear, ‘William Wilson’ style.

     How did you get involved with the IAAS?

I was bundled into the back of a van on the way to college one morning and ‘encouraged’ to join if I wanted to keep researching American literature.  But it turned out to be one of my most rewarding abductions ever!

Actual Answer:  Back in 2001 or 2, my PhD supervisor sensibly advised me to give my first ever conference paper at one of the annual IAAS postgrad symposiums, which was held in Cork. I was very favourably impressed by the quality of the contributions from the other students and by the openness and friendliness of the organisation at large. It was also very useful to be exposed to papers that came from a broader American Studies perspective than I would normally have encountered during the course of my own research, which was quite nuclear holocaust and unhappy suburban housewife-centric at the time.  (Nothing much has changed there).

     In an alternate universe to question 4, you have somehow ended up establishing your own university. What’s the motto?

“Grimdark University: Preparing Our Students for a Dystopian Tomorrow, Today”

     We’re all going to call around this evening. What’s for dinner?

If you have the good manners to ring me a couple of hours beforehand with advance warning, I’ll rustle up some half-way competent casserole or a really nice stir fry. If you show up unannounced, it will be cream crackers and peanut butter, at most.  The chippers round my way are all pretty mediocre.

     Who is your hero, academic or otherwise?

I have quite a few. Before the age of 12 or so, Joan of Arc, Miss Piggy, and Constance Markievicz all loomed large: as a horror obsessed teenager it was Stephen King, whose writing on the horror genre introduced me to the idea that one could actually study popular literature for the first time. Shirley Jackson, whose work is the reason that I have an academic career at all, is the writer I idealise most. I also have huge respect for Joyce Carol Oates (the most likable famous writer I have ever seen up-close in person, and a stellar and underappreciated talent), and Davids Cronenberg and Bowie.

     Free space! You have about 200 words to plug something dear to your heart/announce plans to take over the universe/tell us about the grand plans you have as a member of the committee…

As a committee member, I would strongly encourage Irish-based students or academics working on any aspect of American culture or society to join the IAAS – it’s an immensely worthwhile and welcoming organisation.

Shameless Self Promotion Plug 1:

Prospective students for the M.Phil in Popular Literature (which I direct) can find information on our course here: https://tcdmphilpoplit.wordpress.com/

Shameless Self Promotion Plug 2:

Key Concepts in Contemporary Popular Fiction and Twenty First Century Popular Fiction are both out later this year from EUP. The collection Lost Souls: Essays on Horror and the Gothic’s Neglected Personages, which contains more than 50 short essays on overlooked but fascinating genre figures, is also out soon, from McFarland and Co.  I co-edited it with Elizabeth McCarthy, with whom I also co-founded and edited the online Irish Journal of Horror and Gothic Studies, which is still going strong with a great new team, ten years later.

 

downloadCatherine Casey is a PhD candidate in the School of English, Drama and Film at UCD where she is working on a dissertation entitled ‘Gender, Space and Power in David Mamet’. With the help of a travel bursary from the IAAS, Catherine was able to travel to the Harry Ransom Center in Texas recently to carry out some important research.

The Harry Ransom Center in Austin, Texas, USA is an internationally recognized archive of primary material on David Mamet’s work in theatre and film that was recommended to me by my supervisor. The Center’s resources include earlier drafts of Mamet’s canonical works, annotations on staging, correspondence, as well as audio and DVD/video recordings of master classes held in a range of American universities on his unique approach to directing for film.

Founded in 1957 by former president and administrator of the University of Texas, Harry Huntt Ransom (1908-1976), the H.R.C. is an archive, library, and museum specializing in the collection of literary and cultural artifacts from the U.S. as well as Europe for the purpose of developing scholarship in the area of arts and the humanities.

The Mamet collection is quite extensive consisting of more than 300 boxes, as well as sound recordings and films. Since much of the material is not classified, I needed to focus my search on material specifically pertaining to selected works related to my thesis.  Research involved a number of activities. I scanned and compared earlier drafts of iconic works to evaluate how the final draft was developed; listened to recordings, and viewed films on all aspects of his work, including those that outline Mamet’s epistemological directing approach and its relevance to the theories of Russian film theorist Sergei Eisenstein. I examined documentation on Mamet’s correspondence with other practitioners. A number of scans of folders for use in Dublin were also ordered.

This research trip was very fruitful. I retrieved several pieces of archival material on Mamet that are imperative to my academic research.  They directly relate to analyses I have initiated, supporting and extrapolating arguments and aiding the primary and original value of my research. This research required that I be in situ in the Centre since most material was not catalogued. Importantly, I secured copies of unique correspondence between Mamet and English director and playwright Harold Pinter pivotal for critical scholarship on Mamet.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank my supervisor Dr. Catherine Leeney for her guidance and support as well as the School of English, Drama and Film in U.C. D. Also my special thanks to Dr. Alan Gibbs, Dr. Dara Downey, and the Irish Association of American Studies for their generous funding without which this trip would not have been possible.

s200_david_deaconEarlier this year, David Deacon, a PhD student at University College Dublin, was the first-place recipient of the IAAS Postgraduate Research and Travel Bursary.    Below, he reports on how the grant has facilitated his work, and offers us a fascinating insight into his research.

 

It is no secret amongst the dedicated community of Cormac McCarthy scholars that the reclusive novelist and playwright is well acquainted with Ireland. Much of The Road (2006) was certainly completed here, with select pieces of his written correspondence during this period appearing on headed paper from The Shelbourne Hotel, amongst other notable locations around the country. At the end of 2005, as the novel neared publication, he writes to his acquaintance and avid book collector, J. Howard Woolmer, stating, “I was in Ireland most of last summer and got quite a bit done. The place has changed a lot. Money will do that.” It seems he didn’t make much of our era of material prosperity. Perhaps a premonition of its imminent decline informed the mood that would bring us one of the most important novels of the decade. Nonetheless, the opportunity afforded to me by the IAAS Postgraduate Travel Bursary ensured a very valuable change in the trajectory of my own thinking and appreciation of McCarthy, quite distinct from those he was so unsure of ten years ago.

Prior to my visit to McCarthy’s archives in The Wittliff Collections, located at the State University of Texas, San Marcos, I attended and presented a paper at “God and the American Writer,” an American Literature Association conference held in San Antonio. The paper argued for the presence of “difficult atheism” flowing through the author’s later prose. This concept was informed by Christopher Watkin’s 2011 book, in which he suggested that atheism, materialism and secularism are being thought of anew in contemporary philosophy — an assertion that I transposed to McCarthy’s philosophical prose. The panel was chaired by Stacey Peebles, and saw lengthy and passionate discussion between all panelists, along with notable McCarthy scholars Steven Frye and Allen Josephs, who were in attendance.

The Wittliff Collections kindly facilitated my week long visit to McCarthy’s archive, where I began by immersing myself in the collection of letters between the author and J. Howard Woolmer, mentioned above. These letters afford the scholar a rare glimpse of the thought process and laconic humour possessed by the quasi-ascetic novelist, from reports of hunting bears with hounds, to dreading the cessation of his MacArthur grant in the mid-1980s because he’d “gotten used to eating regularly.” The visit also afforded me the opportunity to acquaint myself with the unpublished screenplay, Whales and Men, the only copies of which reside in the Wittliff Collections. In it, his protagonists muse upon the communicative abilities of whales, and as such McCarthy’s astounding knowledge of and obsession with linguistics becomes evident to the visiting researcher. The unique, intrinsic, and central capacity of language to human experience, and the manner in which it can convey meaning, whilst simultaneously expressing the utter lack of it available to our conscience when subjected to a postmodern critique, forms a recurrent theme and concern in the extensive notations on drafts. Wittgenstein receives several mentions, whilst his love of Plato, Aristotle, and Nietzsche are in plain sight throughout, reminding us of the philosophical erudition that informs all of his writing. It is this richness which will keep scholars visiting and revisiting the archive for the foreseeable future.

With assistance from the IAAS, I was able to explore and contemplate these sources. They will undoubtedly inform and enrich my own PhD thesis, in part investigating McCarthy’s appropriation of religious ritual and sentiment, creating a postsecular tension in his later writing. My sincere thanks go to everyone at the Association.

james croninJames G.R. Cronin, a part-time doctoral history student under the supervision of Professor David Ryan, Head of the School of History at University College Cork, was the recipient of an IAAS Postgraduate Research & Travel Bursary in May 2015, along with David Deacon of UCD.

James’s study focuses on the social criticism of American writer Thomas Merton (1915-1968). James is concentrating on Merton’s essays on war and peace specifically written to mobilize American public opinion against the arms race in the year prior to the Cuban Missile Crisis during October 1962. He is especially interested in exploring how Merton employed independent media networks of production and distribution to circumvent the normalizing discourses circulated by the mass media throughout American society at the height of the Cold War (1947-91). James has used the IAAS bursary to support his research at the Thomas Merton Center at Bellarmine University in Louisville, Kentucky. For information on this archive and the writings of Thomas Merton please visit http://merton.org/

P1040702In September I returned from a three month research trip at the University of California, Berkeley; the home of the Free Speech Movement. 

I’ve reflected a lot on my time in Berkeley. Writing about the experience has certainly helped clarify my thoughts, to fully appreciate what I achieved in a relatively short period. However in the weeks following my return, when friends and colleagues enquired about my trip I inevitably replied with a long pause, a furrowed brow and a drawn out ‘Well….’ as I tried to describe an experience that defies summary, and a city full of stark juxtapositions between poverty and wealth, history and technology, 60s ideals and modern-day reality. 

My confusion at the time was a reflection on the state of the work I did there: a lot of ideas, a sense of achievement, reams and reams of notes with very little structure or a purpose that would be evident to anyone other than me. The readjustment to my regular regime since my return has been even tougher. Three months on the other side of the world, away from the distractions of daily life, commitments, friends and family would seem, to a normal person, a sad and lonely time. For a scholar it was a dusty, silent heaven. Nobody wanted coffee, ever. It was just me and the library, all day, every day. 
 
I went into the experience with much trepidation. Aside from the logistical issues that come with spending so much time so far from home, I wasn’t sure what I was supposed to achieve, what a research trip entailed, how I would force myself to spend three months in a library and not outside in the sunshine? 


I sought advice from everyone. I attended a seminar on archival research (a command performance, I suggested a friend give it), and came up with a clear set of questions for myself: 


What can I achieve in Berkeley that I could not achieve at home?

What items in the Bancroft Archives are of interest to me? More importantly, what items are of relevance to me?
What single achievement would define this trip, what single purpose would make the financial and familial sacrifices worthwhile?P1040706
 
Answers started to present themselves almost immediately. The UCB library is truly state of the art, with an extensive American Studies collection. There is no resource required for my research that this library could not provide. Three months suddenly started to seem like a very short time: I needed to prioritise. What could I only read in Berkeley, that I could not get through my library at home? A much more manageable reading list quickly emerged.

 
Secondly, what material could I access in the Bancroft Archives that would be of relevance to my research? My friend advised me to approach the archive with specific questions that I may find answers to, but also suggested I go in with an open mind. This turned out to be excellent advice: my curiosity was roused by the Free Speech Movement, and my research explores, to an extent, connections between Kurt Vonnegut and Joseph Heller’s books and the anti-war movement and associated protest movements of the 60s and 70s. What I really wanted was some sort of concrete evidence (beyond Kurt Vonnegut’s constant assertions that yes, he was very inspirational to the anti-war movement) that students at that time were reading Catch-22. (Slaughterhouse-Five was not published until 1969, so not much chance of popping up on FSM reading lists…) I related this to the Special Collections librarian, pondering out loud more than asking for help, and she recommended Seth Rosenfeld’s Subversives: The FBI’s War on Student Radicals, and Reagan’s Rise to Power, a recently published history written in a pleasant journalistic tone, focusing very much on Berkeley’s Free Speech Movement. Rosenfeld, the librarian told me, had done much of his work in the Bancroft Archives. I checked the book out and settled into a beaten leather armchair in the Morrison reading room, where laptops are outlawed. I was completely submersed, free from interruptions, and eventually had my ‘Eureka!’ moment:

 
“The second issue [of Spider, an underground student publication], for example, critiqued an article about reading trends on campus that had appeared in The New York Times Book Review. Spider challenged the Times’s claim that J. D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye (1951) and William Golding’s Lord of the Flies (1954) – both fundamentally apolitical works whose protagonists are adolescents had the greatest following among college students. This was out-of-date, according to Spider, which suggested that readership of Joseph Heller’s anti bureaucracy novel, Catch-22 (1961), and James Baldwin’s tale of Greenwich Village bohemians, Another Country (1962), provide a more accurate gauge of current student interests” (Rosenfeld, Chapter 16). 


Leaping out of my seat in the Morrison I returned immediately to Special Collections, lodged a request for all copies of Spider, and spent the rest of the afternoon pouring over them, grinning from ear to ear. The librarian assured me that ‘Eureka!’ moments are fairly common in the Bancroft Reading Room. 

 
The most important thing however, that which quickly became my primary objective, was securing an interview with author Tom Robbins. He lives in La Conner, Washington, a town he references frequently in his work. I was as close as I was ever going to be, and decided to do everything in my power to secure an interview. I was utterly stumped as to how to go about it. From limited experience in the publishing field I knew that authors were contacted via their agents, and further I knew the name of Robbins’ agent because he had written about her many times. She was without internet presence, and being a child of the internet, this flummoxed me. I perused Robbins’ online fan base, the AftrLife, which has not been maintained in some time. I emailed the editor of that site, seeking advice: nothing. I had an address for a PO Box for fan mail, but being a very serious literary scholar did not wish to go down this route. Then, one day, I received a Google Alert which directed me to a website that mentioned Robbins’ forthcoming autobiographical collage, hinting at a change of publisher. I took a chance and emailed the new publicist. 

 
Several weeks and several more emails later I found myself driving through the blackberry capital of America to La Conner, in Skagit Bay. I took meticulous care with my appearance. I wanted to come across as scholarly, serious, but also unpretentious. I wanted to ask intelligent questions, but also wanted Mr Robbins to feel at ease with me; he is notoriously suspicious of academics and has written several damning (and often hilarious) tirades against our kind. Mr Robbins, apparently, also spent some time on his wardrobe that morning. Greeting me in the local book shop he lifted his trouser leg showing off green socks and green shoes in honour of my Irishness, informing me with a wink that he had dressed for the occasion. He gave me almost two hours of his time, answering my questions honestly and openly, commenting on my ideas about his work, his ideas about humour and play, and even a little anecdote about Kurt Vonnegut – but I shall have to save that for my thesis. During the course of the interview I mentioned Tony Vigorito, the only other living author in my study:

 
P1040708“I’m very fond of Tony,” said Tom, and after we discussed Just a Couple of Days for a moment, and its relevance to my research, he followed up with “I think he’s living in San Francisco.”

“You’re kidding me, I thought he lived in Hawaii?” I replied. This is nonsense, Tony Vigorito does not, nor has he ever, lived in Hawaii. I don’t know where I got this from. “Oh, I have to find him,” I said. 

When I landed back in San Francisco I had an email from Tony Vigorito. Tom had told him to get in touch with me.


I interviewed Tony a week later in Guerrilla Cafe on North Shattuck, the day before I returned home. He was on his way back from Burning Man.

It just doesn’t get more Berkeley than that.

— Rosemary Gallagher