Critical topics and methods have changed in countless ways from the heyday of the formalist critics of the 1940s and 50s. Writers such as Wellek, Brooks, Wimsatt, Frye and Matthiessen were continuously challenged by later generations who questioned the ideological, gendered, and ethnocentric assumptions guiding the critical preoccupations and methods of the Formalist school. This panel seeks papers focused on the possibility for questioning, intervention, or reversal implicitly or explicitly expressed in the interpretive models and rhetorical form of one or more standard texts from this era of American literary criticism, such as The Well-Wrought Urn, American Renaissance, The Verbal Icon, Theory of Literature or Anatomy of Criticism. Depending on one’s current methods and materials, is this text now a classic or a dinosaur? How do the poetics, aesthetics and theoretical principles of these works compare to the key texts and methods of the last twenty years? Papers may consider one or more of the major critical texts of the era (1940-1960), or provide an exposition regarding a lesser known, though significant work.

 

Location: Baltimore, Maryland (Marriot Waterfront)
Organization: Northeast Modern Language Association

Contact Email: inksaudible@gmail.com

 

Registration now open for a symposium at the Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge.

Dates: Friday 23rd & Saturday 24th September 2016.

Keynote speakers: Michelle Martin, University of Washington, and Gabrielle Cliff-Hodges, University of Cambridge.

Published in 1976, Mildred Taylor’s best-known work Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry continues to be highly celebrated and challenged. A Newbury Award Winner, appearing in school curricula in both the US and UK, Roll of Thunder also appears on the infamous ‘banned books’ lists. Taylor’s work has been discussed by a range of academics in education and literary research, and this symposium will explore multiple strands of thought and dialogue on this landmark text and related themes and issues in children’s literature.

Day Two of the symposium will focus on educational issues, bringing together researchers with teachers, trainees and other practitioners to share ideas about Roll of Thunder and children’s literature more generally.

 

Deadline for submissions: September 23, 2016

Organisation: Cambridge/Homerton Research & Teaching Centre for Children’s Literature, Cambridge University (UK)

 

Contact Sarah Hardstaff at sflh2@cam.ac.uk or Dawn Sardella-Ayres at ds632@cam.ac.uk.

See the symposium webpage here for further details and booking: https://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/events/conferences/rollofthunder40/

 

I invite proposals for a collection of essays that examines the theme of revenge in American fiction, film, and television. Vengeance – that quest for violent reciprocity – is one of storytelling’s oldest and most enduring plots. But in the modern American imaginary the familiar shape of retribution assumes a new form. Over and over, avengers on page and screen desire not only blood but also symbolic victories. In Sherman Alexie’s Indian Killer (1996) a troubled protagonist named John Smith yearns to kill the one “white man [who] was responsible for everything that had gone wrong” for Native Americans. In Don DeLillo’s Cosmopolis (2003), an outraged financial analyst assassinates a billionaire who upset the “balance” of global capitalism. For these characters, personal grievance turns into political statement, and payback evolves from a selfish drive into a systemic reckoning. From bloodthirsty class warriors in The Iron Heel (1908) and Absalom, Absalom! (1936) to anti-patriarchal furies of Beloved (1987) and Foxfire (1993) to contemporary assailants in The Wire (2002-2008) and Django Unchained (2012), avengers haunt American narratives.

Despite vengeance’s popularity across 20th- and 21st-century fiction, television, and film, little research on the topic exists. While scholars have thoroughly examined the classical, dramatic traditions of revenge tragedies – especially those from Attic and Elizabethan/Jacobean periods – they have left modern American iterations of the genre largely unconsidered. In fact, no book-length study dedicated to American revenge narratives exists in recent criticism.

Reckonings fixes this scholarly blind spot by historicizing the revenge genre’s unique transformations in American culture over the long century. For this anthology, I welcome essays that theorize the complex visions of retributive justice found in the nation’s stories. The volume will occupy a unique place in literary and American studies, offering critics and cultural historians a revenge genre study of unprecedented depth.

Some topics of interest are (but not limited to):

Revenge in American modernism
Revenge in graphic novels
Philosophies of retribution in contemporary fiction
Feminism, vengeance, and film
Lesser-known or avant garde treatments of the revenge genre
Avengers and environmentalism
Revenge in serial television
Depictions of vengeance and the American justice system
Science fiction and revenge
Psychology, narrative, and the science of payback
Vengeance and morality
21st century re-imaginings of the revenge tragedy
Please send a 500-700 word chapter abstract and CV to Kyle Wiggins (kwiggins@bu.edu) by September 6, 2016. I expect to include approximately 10 essays of 8,000 words each. Accepted authors must submit completed chapters by January 17, 2017.

Publication discussions with an intererested press have begun.

Deadline for submissions: September 6, 2016
Full name / name of organization: Kyle Wiggins, Boston University
Contact email: kwiggins@bu.edu

Louis Owens (1948-2002) was one of the major voices of contemporary Native American literature and scholarship. His work includes five acclaimed novels, scholarly studies, and some one hundred essays. The extensive oeuvre Owens produced includes writing on themes of mixed-blood identities, working-class life, travel, the western American landscape, the environment, survivance, tricksters, story-telling, and memory. Owens was a scholar of international stature on John Steinbeck, a figure who strongly influenced his own realist fiction.
This edited collection of critical essays will provide an opportunity for new understandings of the contributions of Louis Owens as a story-teller and scholar. We are soliciting essays dealing with such topics as his gothic and noir modes of fiction; re-workings of Euro-American and indigenous cultures; misunderstanding and non-communication between two worlds; tribal beliefs and Choctaw culture; post-Indianism; dispossession, alienation, and exilic existence; historiographic imaginings; violence and evil; environmental despoliation; representations of place and space; and colonial ghosts.

While most of the volume will concern Owens’ fictions, the editors will be interested especially in essays addressing the scholarship of Louis Owens, theoretical contributions, and treatments of his work in comparative global contexts. We welcome and encourage theoretical discussion, but essays should employ clear and accessible language.

Please send 250-word abstracts, or full draft manuscripts of previously unpublished material, to the co-editors no later than January 31, 2017 for consideration. Include a 100-150 word bio. Authors will be notified by February 15, 2017. Final drafts of selected abstracts or manuscripts will be due on June 30, 2017. Essays should not exceed 10,000 words; bibliography in Chicago style; and 11 pt. Courier font with one inch margin. Anticipated date of manuscript completion to be submitted to the publisher for peer review is planned for December 1, 2017. Revisions will be required in early fall of 2017. Publication of individual manuscripts cannot be guaranteed.

Send proposals and submissions as Word file attachments via email to both Joe Lockard (Joe.Lockard@asu.edu), Department of English, Arizona State University, and Irene Vernon (Irene.Vernon@colostate.edu), Chair, Ethnic Studies Department, Colorado State University. Queries are welcomed.

Location: Cardiff
Salary: £31,656 to £37,768 per annum (Grade 6)
Hours: Full Time
Contract Type: Contract / Temporary
Placed on: 29th July 2016
Closes: 29th August 2016

The School of English, Communication & Philosophy at Cardiff University wishes to appoint a Teacher with a strong teaching record in Romantic literature and nineteenth-century British or American literature. The successful candidate will have sole responsibility for framing and delivering dynamic 3rd and 2nd Year modules in those areas. S/he may also be asked to deliver existing Year 1 provision.

Starting date: 1 February 2017. This post is full-time and fixed-term until 31 January 2018.

For informal enquires regarding this post, please contact Prof Katie Gramich (GramichK@cardiff.ac.uk)

It is anticipated that interviews will be held mid-September.

Please be aware that Cardiff University reserves the right to close this vacancy early should sufficient applications be received.

Cardiff University is committed to supporting and promoting equality and diversity. Our inclusive environment welcomes applications from talented people from diverse backgrounds.

http://www.jobs.ac.uk/job/AOG873/teacher-in-english-literature-fixed-term/

Violence interpreted: Connections between the Violent Past of the United States and Conflict Today.

Violent confrontations and racial discrimination have influenced the United States on multiple levels. At the beginning of the twentieth century the country confronted a wave of violent unrests that molded American society and prepared the ground for massive changes in political, social and financial realms. After a century, the country seems to still be affected by racial discrimination and police violence; the current global upheavals and the political rhetoric for the 2016 presidential election intensify the polarisation within American society. Scholarly interpretation of violence will lead to a better understanding of both past and present of conflict in the United States.

We seek submissions for a forthcoming special issue of the European Journal of American Culture focusing on interpretations of violence in American society and the examination of possible historic recurrences. We are particularly interested in interdisciplinary papers that will explore the connections between past and present violent tensions in the United States. Papers are welcome to draw from a diverse range of interrelated topics including but not limited to, African American studies, American history, sociology, anthropology, cultural and behavioral studies, politics and media, identity and diversity.

The European Journal of American Culture (EJAC) is an academic, refereed journal for scholars, academics and students from many disciplines with a common involvement in the interdisciplinary study of America and American culture, drawing on a variety of approaches and encompassing the whole evolution of the country. Please consult the website for more information http://www.intellectbooks.co.uk/journals/view-journal,id=138/

Articles should be 6,000 to 8,000 words, inclusive of footnotes. EJAC uses Harvard style. The journal welcomes copyright- cleared images.  Please submit an abstract of approximately 300 words by September 8th 2016 to the email below for consideration. Manuscripts would be due by January 1st2017.

Guest Editor of the Violence Issue

Konstantinos D. Karatzas, University of Zaragoza, Spain

664209@celes.unizar.es, k_karatzas@yahoo.com

 

Contact Info:

Konstantinos D. Karatzas,  University of Zaragoza, Spain

Contact Email:
Deadline for submissions:
September 10, 2016
Full name / name of organization:
Southern American Studies Association
Contact email:

This proposed session for SASA 2017 pushes and pulls beyond traditional notions of the “gothic,” horror, and hauntings, instead engaging with more expansive ideas enabled by recent theorizations of undeadness. Special attention will be given to proposals that link forms of undeadness associated in some way with the American South to formulations in or across other regions and nations. What is “undead nation,” and how might we understand it in relation to undead Souths? How does undeadness migrate and circulate across regional and national frames and at the same time backlight gender, sexuality, race, settler colonialism, and more? In addition to taking up these and other questions, we invite panelists to discuss cultural artifacts from a spectrum of media including literature, film, music, comics, photography, painting, digital art, video games, and more.

 

Please email an abstract (250-500 words) and a one-page CV to Eric Gary Anderson (George Mason University) at eandersd@gmu.edu and Daniel Cross Turner (Coastal Carolina University) at dturner1@coastal.edu. We ask that you send your materials as an attachment and that you also copy them into the text of your message.

 

Deadline: September 10, 2016

SASA: March 2-4, 2017, at The College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA

deadline for submissions:
October 1, 2016
full name / name of organization:
NANO: New American Notes Online
contact email:

Gift exchange is odd, even paradoxical. Giving requires calculation; one must consider the recipient’s need and one’s capacities. And, after the gift is given, expectation sets in. Was it well received? Will it be reciprocated? As many have noted, the gift, though ostensibly selfless, is very much an interested activity. All the calculations leading up to and following a gift exchange reveal the rules that govern a society, even the tacit ones. The gift is an object and a process. The gift moves, and it also—as a keepsake or memorial—stays put. The gift is personal, social, and cosmic.

Ralph Waldo Emerson writes that “the only gift is a gift of self.” For him, the gift is about affinity and recognition: “The gift, to be true, must be the flowing of the giver unto me, correspondent to my flowing unto him.” Where for Emerson the gift is about love, for Marcel Mauss, the gift is about the circulation of social power. The gift invites prolific interpretation so much so that, for Georges Bataille, the gift itself is the sign of a general economy of expenditure in which excesses of wealth and energy are either sacrificed in the potlatch of war or formed into art. For Lewis Hyde, gift exchange is the model of all creative work; generosity of spirit is the artist’s permission to create, and that work is the artist’s gift. Jacques Derrida in his later years finds that the gift is about time: when one gives a gift, one gives the time in which the gift circulates—the delay in which to ponder the reception or to expect the return gift. Working in a contrary direction, Anne Carson and Maurice Godelier understand giving as a form of keeping. Carson suggests that the role of the poet is historically one of “memorable naming,” that the artist’s gift is memory. Godelier argues that, despite Mauss’s emphasis on circulation, many gifts are “inalienable.” They are not given into circulation but into sequestration, and social orders depend upon restricting the circulation of gifts we mark as sacred. More recently, feminist theorists such as Tracy McNulty and Rosalyn Diprose have explored ways in which the gift and generosity negotiate relations between the self and culturally different others.

With so many masks, the gift can be found in many exchanges. In what ways is the gift interested or disinterested in some form of compensation, as in the Marshall Plan, or the Koch brothers’ support of PBS and NPR programming? How is the gift functioning as an alternative to traditional capital campaigns on sites like GoFundMe.com? How is it a gift of self, as in the vulnerability and challenge in Yoko Ono’s Cut Piece? When is it about connection and communication, as in Marina Abramovic’s Silent Sitting? Are gifts like Christo and Jean Claude’s self-funded installations Gates and Running Fence somehow different in meaning from other public artworks? In what sense is the gift’s creation of a community also an exclusion, as we might see in various acts of patronage, such as Ezra Pound’s support of writers aligned with his own aesthetic agendas? To what extent does Mauss’s notion of giving as display of wealth live on in Gatsby’s parties or Musk’s SpaceX? Does the gift as expenditure appear in open-software movements, Sweden’s Pirate Party? What might be the role of the gift and related rituals of hospitality in the context of current debates about immigration and the refugee crisis?

This issue welcomes multimodal essays up to 4,000 words (excluding works cited) exploring such topics as gifts and:

  • literature and/or poetry
  • indebtedness
  • inspiration and talent
  • re-gifting and revenge
  • consumer culture
  • strangers/refugees
  • contagion/disease
  • death
  • gender
  • ethics
  • medical technologies (e.g., organ donation, fertility therapies, genetics)
  • social media
  • labor (e.g., unpaid/under-compensated labor, internships, academic publishing, the art market)
  • intellectual property and information sharing

Direct questions to the Special Issue co-editors: Jennie Stearns [jstearns@ggc.edu] and J.P. Craig [jcraig@alasu.edu]. For questions about video, audio, or image usage, please contact NANO: editornano@citytech.cuny.edu.

NANO uses modified MLA (Modern Language Association) formatting and style.

Submission style guidelines: http://www.nanocrit.com/submissions-information/style-guide-nano/

Submission form: http://www.nanocrit.com/submissions-information/submission-form-page-nano1

Keywords and abstract: Each author is asked to submit 5 keywords and a 250-word abstract to accompany their submission.

Schedule: Deadlines concerning the special issue to be published in NANO:

Submission deadline: October 1, 2016

Pre-production begins January 2017

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Our Mission: NANO is an interdisciplinary academic journal whose goal is to invigorate humanities discourse by publishing brief, peer-reviewed reports with a fast turnaround enabled by digital technologies.

www.nanocrit.com

Migration, Diaspora, Circulation and Translation 

October 5-7, 2017

University College Dublin, Clinton Institute for American Studies

Dublin, Ireland

A conference sponsored by the Charles Brockden Brown Society

(www.brockdenbrownsociety.ucf.edu)

Our conference site in Dublin calls to mind issues of migration, immigration, emigration, colonization, revolution, and other changes that result from the movement of people, ideas, and things from one place to another. Such issues were significant in colonial and early national American writing and thought in the long eighteenth century. The current global migration crisis and the recent “Brexit” vote makes these topics timely for reappraisal: as millions of migrants and asylum seekers cross into Europe, the world confronts questions about borders, resources, community, poverty, wealth, understanding of cultural differences, and human rights. The Eleventh Biennial Conference of the Charles Brockden Brown Society invites papers on all aspects of diaspora, migration, circulation, and translation in the long eighteenth century. The following list offers some examples of suggested topics:

  • Texts (letters, periodicals, books, treatises) that migrate from one place to another
  • Migration of species, and theories of natural history that involve migration or hibernation
  • Spread of genetic material in plants or other living beings; ecological biology, biodiversity, monoculture or related concepts
  • Movement of food, drink and other cultural practices related to agriculture, food preparation and/or eating
  • Loss inherent in places from which migration takes place on a large scale
  • Changing boundaries of nations, places, concepts (gender, childhood, etc.) during the long eighteenth century
  • Colonial and/or imperial repercussions of migration
  • Representations of Irishness as an unstable category in the long eighteenth century
  • Maria Edgeworth’s influence on American texts
  • Literary hoaxes and their reliance on dissemination
  • Ways that “contagion” works differently than “diaspora” as a trope
  • Adaptations, literary influences, allusions, plagiarism, copyright issues
  • Charles Brockden Brown’s depiction of migration, circulation, translation
  • Migratory labor, including prisoners, apprentices, and chattel slaves
  • The effects of borders and border crossing in domestic (national and private) spaces

Although we are an author society, we solicit proposals from a broad range of texts and practices beyond those associated with Brown and his writings alone. We also encourage interdisciplinary scholarship and work emphasizing non-U.S. literatures. Our conference culture aims to create a space of egalitarian consideration free from career-oriented and competitive attitudes, a place for new work to blossom. In this light, we have no concurrent sessions, so that all may be heard by all. Because of time/space constraints, we may ask you to reframe your proposed talk as a brief (5-10 minute) presentation for inclusion within a roundtable format.

Travel Support for Graduate Students:

Two travel awards of $500 each for graduate student participation will be awarded, funded by the Brown Society. Criteria for these travel subventions will favor students at the dissertation stage (over those in earlier stages of degree work) and those who have not previously presented at a CBBS meeting. Graduate students applying for a subvention should indicate their interest in a cover letter and provide information about whether or not they are ABD.

250-word proposal deadline: February 15, 2017  Please send a proposal in .docx format to hewitt.33@osu.edu.

Jennifer Daly recently completed her PhD at Trinity College Dublin and is the current Secretary of the IAAS

20160809_100307How did you end up where you are now?

I finished my BA at UCD in 2003 and had great plans to keep going in academia after completing the MA in American Literature (also at UCD) in 2004. Then, y’know, I had bills to pay so I worked for a while. Then I got bored of that and went back to do the American Studies MA at the Clinton Institute and had such great plans to continue in academia once I finished that in 2006 except, y’know, plans don’t always work out so I went off and worked in retail/admin/anything that paid for a few years. After many conversations with the legendary Ron Callan, I finally, finally started a PhD in Trinity in 2012. Having just passed my viva in June (hurray!) I can safely say I have no idea where I am.

TL;DR: I took the scenic route.

Tell us a little bit about your current research interests?

Well. My thesis looked at masculinity in American fiction, specifically Richard Yates, Richard Ford, and Jonathan Franzen. It also had stuff on suburbs, and exceptionalism, and identity… so I’ll probably keep going with that for a while because it’s FUN. Outside of that, I also work on Marilynne Robinson, and have always had a soft spot for Presidential speechwriting so might do something on that soon. My thesis for the American Lit MA was on John Steinbeck’s use of the Bible, and my thesis for the American Studies MA was on faith-based initiatives so religious things get a look in quite a bit in terms of what I like to think about as well.

Favourite book/film/album?

Book: Gilead by Marilynne Robinson; The Easter Parade by Richard Yates; Canada by Richard Ford; Witches Abroad by Terry Pratchett; The Elements of Style (I’m not even joking).

Film: The Castle (the Australian comedy). Oh! And Submarine. And also It’s A Wonderful Life. Zuzu’s petals get me every time. Also The Umbrellas of Cherbourg, because I’ll never not be amazed by the colours and the costume design and the wallpaper-matching clothes.

Album: Um. I’m going to cheat and say the album I’ve compiled that consists of REM’s entire back catalogue (but not Around the Sun). If I have to base my selection on current heavy rotation, Veckatimest by Grizzly Bear. Or In Rainbows by Radiohead. Or Closing Time by Tom Waits.

I’m bad at picking favourites.

Universities don’t exist. What job would you have instead?

Speechwriter. Or baker. Or general organiser of stuff, if that’s even a job.

Failing that I’ll be Donna Moss. Or Donna Paulsen. Basically I’ll be Donna.

Who would play you in the movie of your life?

I was told once I looked like Rachel Weisz. Poor Rachel. So I’ll go with Allison Janney because everyone would just be all like “Oh my God, Allison Janney is SO cool!” and she would win all the awards and I would accidentally become cool as a result.

How did you get involved with the IAAS?

I heard vague rumblings about it in my first run at postgrad work in the early 2000s. I might even have gone to something once. Then it fell off my radar until I started the PhD and my supervisor, Stephen Matterson, made it sound like I would fail at life if I didn’t at least join the association. So I did that, and ended up getting one of the PG bursaries to go to the BAAS postgrad conference in 2012 so I thought that this association knew what it was doing. Then I made the big mistake of going to the AGM at the Limerick conference in 2013, and by virtue of being the only other postgrad in the room besides Rosemary, I got nominated as PG rep, and since 2015 I’ve been the Secretary.

In other news, my term expires next year.

In an alternate universe to question 4, you have somehow ended up establishing your own university. What’s the motto?

We always have time for coffee. But in Latin.

We’re all going to call around this evening. What’s for dinner?

I’m not great for the main courses. I could rustle up a nice pie? Or some lasagne? My forte is desserts so maybe we could all go out for lunch then head back to mine and I’ll wheel out a dessert trolley. There’ll be the best lemon and mango cheesecake you’ve ever tasted. Maybe some red velvet cake. And some chocolate cake. Shortbread? Something involving rhubarb. And crumble. Rhubarb crumble. Custard! Basically, send me your cake-based requests and I will provide it.

Who is your hero, academic or otherwise?

Ron. Duh. Or Kate Bush.

Free space! You have about 200 words to plug something dear to your heart/announce plans to take over the universe/tell us about the grand plans you have as a member of the committee…

Things I’m currently working on include an edited collection for McFarland on Richard Yates (forthcoming in 2017), a special issue of the Irish Journal of American Studies on Marilynne Robinson (also in 2017), and finding a job (insert year here). If you’re interested in any of those things then get in touch!

More to the point, please get involved in the IAAS! In the few years I’ve been involved it has been kind of amazing to see how much it has grown and evolved into something really great. It would be lovely to see that continue with a whole bunch of enthusiastic new people getting involved and bringing exciting new ideas to the table. Tell all your friends, and bring them to events with you, and even if you don’t want to be on the committee send us your ideas anyway. We love a good idea and will always accurately cite our sources.