Deadline for submissions: February 24, 2017
Full name / name of organization: Binghamton University
Contact email: shiftingborders@gmail.com
Shifting Tides, Anxious Borders: A Graduate Student Conference

in Transnational American Studies (8th Annual)

Binghamton University

Saturday, April 8, 2017

Keynote: Russ Castronovo, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Deadline for Proposal Submission: February 24th, 2017

“Shifting Tides, Anxious Borders” is an interdisciplinary graduate conference dedicated to exploring the changing contours of the field of American Studies. This year’s conference theme, “Globalizing the Commons, Localizing the Transnational”, focuses on the transnational turn in American Studies in an effort to re-think the field imaginary, paying particular attention to the intersecting sites of identity, community, nation, and globalization along with the methodological trajectories which make these sites legible. Keeping in mind recent anthological interventions—Globalizing American Studies (2010), Re-Framing the Transnational Turn in American Studies (2011), and American Studies as Transnational Practice (2015), to name just a few—the conference seeks to investigate the conditions through which discussions of the transnational dialectically broaden the scope of the field while underestimating the nuances of the local, and, by the same concern, how local attentiveness precludes visibility of global, coalitional resistance.

In keeping with this year’s focus, we seek papers concerned with the relationships between conceptions of the local, national, and the global, as well as the liminality inherent to the delineation of these spaces. In lieu of examining the well-trodden ground of ‘the state of the field’ and resonant attempts to redefine American studies itself, we encourage papers that attend to more interdisciplinary limits of subjectivity, the state, and global community. We seek papers that localize the transnational, totalize the provincial, and speak to the constituting horizons necessarily produced by these methodologies.

Redolent questions include: How does the global trajectory of capitalism become individualized in neoliberalism? What are the resonances between the global war on terror and the militarization of local police forces? How do identitarian frameworks potentialize coalition while restricting conditions of belonging? More broadly speaking, when considering the roots of the transnational turn are found in the transatlantic, how can we resituate and trouble Occidental cultural dialogues between the United States and Europe? Finally, how is the totalizing schema of the anthropocene configured along local and global registers?

To submit a paper proposal, send a 250-word abstract to shiftingborders@gmail.com. To submit a panel proposal, include the names and email addresses of three participants, with individual paper abstracts and a 150-word abstract uniting them. Possible topics include, but are not limited to:

Archipelagos and the Transnational Pacific
The Speculative Limits of Finance Capital
Racialized Transatlantic Histories and Communities
Mapping Subject and Species through Biopower
Relationships between Isolationism and American Empire
Feminist Coalition / Resistance and Co-opting Identity
Trauma in the Local/Transnational Sites of War on Terror
Localized Translations / Globalized Dialects
Multiculturalism, Cosmopolitanism, and the Individual
Dronification as / and Destabilized Imperial Violence

Deadline for submissions: March 12, 2017
Full name /name of organization: William Faulkner Society
Contact email: wfsociety@gmail.com
2018 Modern Language Associaton Convention

New York, NY, Jan. 4-7, 2018

The William Faulkner Society will take advantage of the convention location to hold a guaranteed session on the significance of New York City in William Faulkner’s life and work. Faulkner’s self-fashioning as a country mouse from the Mississippi hills belied his periodic turns as a city slicker in New York and other cosmopolitan locales. Faulkner maintained close ties to editors and friends in the city and had a variety of encounters with the literati and other bohemian circles. New York also makes appearances in Faulkner’s fiction—in some instances as an actual setting or destination, in others as a remote but powerful source of cultural and economic influence. From Jason Compson’s stock market debacle in The Sound and the Fury to Linda Snopes Kohl’s radical time as a New Yorker in The Mansion, the presence of the city is felt in Faulkner’s fictional domain. For all of these reasons and more, William Faulkner’s New York is a destination well worth revisiting and exploring. Send a 300-word abstract and brief bio by March 12, 2017, to Ted Atkinson (wfsociety@gmail.com).

Deadline for submissions: June 1, 2017
Full name/name of organization: Society for the History of Authorship, Reading, and Publishing (SHARP)
Contact email: me.makala@gmail.com.
Papers are invited for the SHARP affiliate session at the 2017 South Atlantic Modern Language Association (SAMLA) Convention. Potential topics include print culture, history of the book, authorship, publishing history, ephemera, illustration, publishers’ archives, production, circulation, and reception. Papers addressing this year’s convention theme,“High Art/Low Art Borders and Boundaries in Popular Culture,” are especially welcome. What connections can be made between print culture/book history and the diverse world of popular culture? How has print culture reflected popular taste from the early modern world to the present?

Possible topics include:

Genre fiction

Sensation fiction

Science fiction

Gothic

Ghost stories

Historical fiction/fantasy

Pulp fiction

Detective fiction/thrillers

Adventure fiction

Westerns

Popular magazines

Newspapers

Romance novels (Mills & Boon, etc.)

Reprint libraries

Dime novels

Penny dreadfuls

Ephemera (postcards, pamphlets, broadsides, advertising, etc.)

The evolving study of middlebrow writing

The borderlands of popular print culture (historical, geographical, etc.)

The 89th annual SAMLA Convention will be held November 3-5, 2017 at the Westin Peachtree Plaza in Atlanta, Georgia. Proposers need not be members of SHARP to submit, but panelists must be members of both SAMLA and SHARP in order to present. By June 1, 2017, please send a 350-word abstract and short biography (together in one document) to SHARP at SAMLA liaison Dr. Melissa Edmundson Makala at me.makala@gmail.com.

Deadline for submissions: February 16, 2017
Full name/name of organization: Saint Martin’s University
Contact email: jbirkenstein@stmartin.edu
We seek essays of 5,000 to 6,000 words for an anthology that explores American literature through the lens of social justice. The volume will become a part of a popular literary series published by a major press.

We understand the term “social justice” to refer typically to the advancement of human rights—whether social, racial/cultural, economic, political, or many others besides—and are seeking essays that examine these advancements, or the lack thereof, through American literature. Many American writers have pursued themes of personal and community liberation from oppressive cultural forces. We seek criticism of important writers who have written movingly of their attempts to escape persecution by myriad forces, such as religious indoctrination from family and community; the pervasive, quasi-official heteronormativity supported by standard American culture; the solid, Midwestern American mantras of progress and optimism; or, the lamentable ignorance bred of poverty and isolation. Any American writings, and the authors who penned them, that embrace these or similar themes are well within the range of our interest.

“We, the people,” have long been told that, as John Winthrop put it before the country even existed in his 1630 sermon, “A Modell of Christian Charity”, the United States of America is as a “Shining City Upon a Hill.” While this colonialist perspective completely ignores the original inhabitants of this North American landmass, this idea nevertheless pervades both America’s history and present. Sometimes, even, this idea has been used to uplift peoples and make true social justice progress. Yet, this idea has just as often been used in the name of fear and provincialism and bigotry in order to squash progress, enslave peoples, and hinder all manner of advancement. This bipolar American personality, if you will, this bifurcated tension, has long been at the intersection of great American writing and attempts at social justice progress across a range of issues.

The United States has long been both a refuge for people and writers from many countries and, as a country, a strife-torn nation which has subjugated and oppressed many of its own residents. Thus, in our view, the phrase “social justice” involves not just American-born writers, but also those who have come to this country seeking a better life. Writers could include Harper Lee, William Faulkner, John Steinbeck, Ralph Ellison, Richard Wright, James Baldwin, Toni Morrison, Kurt Vonnegut, Alice Walker, Willa Cather, Edith Wharton, Cormac McCarthy, William S. Burroughs, Jack Kerouac, Allen Ginsburg, Walt Whitman, Zora Neale Hurston, Carson McCullers, J.D. Salinger, Upton Sinclair, Nathanael West, John Hersey, John Updike, Philip Roth, Amy Tam, Sandra Cisneros, Nella Larsen, Sinclair Lewis, Charles Bukowski, Octavia E. Butler, Tomás Rivera, Pat Conroy, Dorothy Canfield Fisher, Gwendolyn Brooks, Elizabeth Hardwick, Tennessee Williams, Arthur Miller, Lorraine Hansberry, August Wilson, Tony Kushner, Amiri Baraka, Langston Hughes, Wendy Wasserstein, Anna Deavere Smith, Sylvia Plath, Louise Erdrich, Maya Angelou, Adrienne Rich, Julia Alvarez, Esmeralda Santiago, Luis Alberto Urrea, Rigoberto González, Rudolfo Anaya, Justin Torres, Jhumpa Lahiri, Maxine Hong Kingston, Porochista Khakpour, Chang-rae Lee, Viet Thanh Nguyen, Khaled Hosseini, Vu Tran, Bharati Mukherjee, Ta-Nehisi Coates, W.E.B. DuBois, Alex Haley, Saul Bellow, Gertrude Stein, Art Spiegelman, Tillie Olsen, Judy Blume, and many, many, many others. Of course, this is necessarily a partial list and we urge you to consider other relevant, well-known American writers who have made their voices known through their writing of social justice.

In line with the expectations of the Critical Insights (Salem Press) series, we seek essays that:

Provide undergraduate and advanced high school students with a comprehensive introduction to works and aspects of American writers whose work and/or lives explored social justice and that they are likely to encounter, discuss, and study in their classrooms;

Help students build a foundation for studying the works and aspects in greater depth by introducing them to key concepts, contexts, critical approaches, and critical vocabulary found in the scholarship relating to social justice and American literature.

This collection will attempt to cover a variety of American cultures and historical periods and envisions understanding the intersection of our contemporary world and various social justice-minded writers in new cultural, historical, spatial, and epistemological frameworks. How does literary production in an increasingly globalized world—when seen through the lens of the search for social justice—serve this search? How does exile push a writer to look outward to new social justice space(s)? How does (do) your chosen text(s) construct meaning at/in/against the context of a globalized, dehumanizing, suffocating, and endless movement of goods and services and ideas across significant regional and international boundaries, often with the goal of silencing local voices and cultures? These and other questions are important to investigate about American social justice writers and, taken in sum, we intend to have an academically rigorous, interesting, and cohesive volume on the topic.

The volumes follow a uniform format, including four original introductory essays as follows:

*a “critical lens” chapter (5,000 words; offers a close reading of the topic embodying a particular critical standpoint)

*a “cultural and historical context” chapter (5,000 words; addresses how the subject at hand influences the theme(s) of social justice across different time periods and American cultures, as well as what continues to make the concept relevant to a contemporary audience)

*a “compare/contrast” chapter (5,000 words; analyzes the topic of social justice with regard to two or three different works, or authors, with some reference to the similarities and differences of their experiences.)

*a “critical reception” chapter (5,000 words; surveys major pieces of comment or criticism on social justice and the major concerns, or aspects, that commentators on the topic have attended to over the years)

The book will also include ten or eleven additional chapters that analyze the themes that pervade the experience of American literature and social justice and focus specific attention on some of the best works and/or authors in the “genre.” Each essay will be about 5,000 words. Together, these chapters will offer readers a comprehensive introduction to the essential themes that arise from the lives and works of those writers who sought, or are yet seeking, increased social justice as they reflect major critical approaches to the topic.

Writers are expected to:

Center their essays on works, topics, and critical approaches that are commonly studied, or perhaps should be, at the advanced high school and undergraduate levels and are representative of foundational and mainstream critical discourse about social justice in the United States. Topics and critical approaches should be neither dated, nor so cutting edge as to risk becoming dated in 5 to 10 years.

For the introductory critical reception and cultural/historical context essays, writers should not devote their essays to selective critical approaches or contexts. Rather, the introductory critical reception essay should offer readers a comprehensive overview of the body of criticism or comment on American social justice, and the introductory cultural/historical context should consider a variety of contexts in which the topic is commonly situated. If you wish your proposal to fulfill one of these overarching thematic goals, please say so in your communication to us.

Abstracts of around 500 words & CV by February 16, 2017 to:

Jeff Birkenstein, Ph.D. Department of English. jbirkenstein@stmartin.edu.

Robert Hauhart, J.D., Ph.D. Department of Society & Social Justice. rhauhart@stmartin.edu.

Saint Martin’s University

5000 Abbey Way SE

Lacey, WA 98503

To the extent that you are already working on author(s) that would be relevant to this volume, and have an interest in our CFP, please contact us to discuss the possibilities. The co-editors have extensive editorial experience, including successful preparation of a companion text, Critical Insights: American Writers in Exile (see http://store.salempress.com/products/9781619255173).

Completed first drafts of around 5,000 words by May 15, 2017.

Trinity Long Room Hub, Trinity College Dublin, 7-8 July 2017

Keynote Speaker: Dr Wim Van Mierlo (Loughborough University)

In recent decades there has been a gradual yet dramatic shift in the means by which scholars engage with literary archives, as the widespread digitization of manuscript texts and the comprehensive shift to digital research tools has changed the nature of scholarly routes into archival material. There has also been a simultaneous shift within archives themselves, as the increasing prevalence of born-digital works necessitates radical changes in methods of curation and preservation.

“Literary Archives in the Digital Age” aims to gather scholars together in order to consider these changes; the conference aims both to showcase contemporary archival research and to reflect on the opportunities and challenges presented by 21st-century archival study. We invite theoretical discussions around self-reflective methodological questions as well as considerations of practical issues such as copyright and access to archival material. We will also consider what Susan Howe has called the “telepathy of archives” – the chance encounters and hidden voices that guide the archival researcher’s journey – and ask how the critic’s encounter with documentary material is altered by digital media. The conference will be an opportunity for dialogue between (among others) curators and literary critics, and researchers working on archives located here in Dublin and those who have explored archives abroad.

Possible topics for consideration include (but are not limited to):

· Cataloguing and preservation

· Word processing and born-digital texts

· Marginalia and correspondence

· Genetic and textual scholarship

· Genetic editing projects

· Copyright and ownership of archival material

· The use of digital tools in navigating archives

· Contemporary access to archives

· Archival items of significance by association; “numinous” objects

· Navigating gaps in archives and/or fragmented archives

· The materiality of digital archives

We also invite proposals for panels or roundtables on a common theme.

The organisers invite abstracts (to: literaryarchives17@gmail.com) of 250 words for proposed 20 minute papers by the 20th of March. Further details will be posted on our website, https://dublinliteraryarchives.com.

University College Dublin

 5-6 May 2017

This conference will examine the political and cultural significance of Donald Trump’s election as president of the United States, and consider the first 100 days of his administration.

Speakers include: Robert Brigham (Vassar College), Scott Lucas (University of Birmingham/EAWorldview), Diane Negra (University College Dublin), Inderjeet Parmar (City, University of London), Donald E. Pease (Dartmouth College).

Topics may include but are not confined to:

“Make America Great Again” – American exceptionalism, nostalgia

“America First” – foreign policy and diplomacy

“Protect our borders” – immigration and terrorism

“Drain the swamp” – Washington elites, lobbying and corruption

“A historic movement” – white nationalism, identity politics, protest

“American carnage” – dystopian visions of the US, narratives of decline

“Crime and gangs and guns” – race and the cities, gun violence, civic anxiety

“Fake news” – politics in the new media age, post-truth, alternative facts

“I have great respect for women” – gender and politics, misogyny, civility

“I am very rich” – inequality, wealth, class

“I’ll be so presidential” – celebrity, reality tv, satire

“Bing, bing, bong, bong” – Trump’s language, rhetoric

“Buy American and hire American” – trade, protectionism

“Brexit’s a great thing” – transatlantic relations, populism, ethnonationalism

We welcome individual papers but also proposals for panels, workshops or alternative sessions for presentation and discussion. Please send a brief CV and summary proposal (300 words max.) by 10th March 2017 to Prof. Liam Kennedy at liam.kennedy@ucd.ie

www.ucdclinton.ie

 

Convened by the Salzburg Seminar American Studies Association

Schloss Leopoldskron, Salzburg, Austria

September 22-26, 2017

Ever since Salzburg Global Seminar was founded in 1947 as the Salzburg Seminar in American Studies, critical dialogue about American society, history, literature, culture, politics, economics and law has played a vital role in our organization’s development and legacy. The annual symposia now convened by the Salzburg Seminar American Studies Association focus on key questions and conflicts influencing American society and culture, in order to foster understanding of how these are influenced by, and influence, the rest of the world.

This landmark session in 2017 has particular resonance in the year of a new US Presidential Administration. Drawing on the seventy years of cross-border exchange that began at Schloss Leopoldskron in the aftermath of war, this multi-disciplinary conversation will examine what the “American Dream“ means in today’s world and assess progress in the United States towards fulfilling that potential. Participants will discuss the quality of life and sense of justice in the United States from a contemporary perspective, including the domestic and global implications of the new Administration in a visibly polarized society.

Life in America is predicated on fair and equal treatment and the expectation of protection by constitutionally-assured rights and justice. Issues such as civil rights, personal safety, pluralism, and access to educational and economic opportunities both challenge and contribute to the quality of life of Americans of every age, gender and ethnicity.

The session will explore historic events related to social progress and literary reflections of the nature and quality of life and justice in America. The function of legal and political institutions at federal, state, and local levels will be examined alongside qualitative dimensions of family, social and personal lives to better understand changing patterns and risks to the social fabric.

Our ultimate purpose will be to compare the historic “Promise of America“ with today’s realities, and to forge ideas and projects that help towards realizing a good life for all in America.

Participant Profile

Salzburg Seminar American Studies Association (SSASA) symposia connect scholars and thought leaders from around the world to build collaborative networks for research and critical debate.

The 2017 session – the 15th SSASA symposium – will bring together approximately 40 participants from more than 25 countries. In addition to public and private sector professionals, participants will include academics teaching about the United States in universities across Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Central, Eastern and Western Europe, as well as the United States. We actively encourage participation by sociologists, representatives of the legal profession, immigration experts, civil rights activists, and other individuals working on issues at the heart of protecting and improving contemporary life in America and ensuring its constructive global involvement.

Program Format

The five-day session will be highly participatory. Daily thematic presentations by distinguished speakers will be followed by plenary discussions, as well as panels on topical issues focused on interaction with participants.  Afternoon sessions will include small thematic discussion groups, providing multiple opportunities for all participants to share their knowledge and expertise on equal terms and to build new alliances and research projects.

Focusing on the context of the Constitution and the judicial system, the 2017 session will consider such issues as: economic equality and the distribution of wealth as it relates to race and gender; the  management of policing and civil rights; fair application of legal protection; availability of employment and equal opportunity; as well as other aspects that contribute to or otherwise relate to the quality of life.

Participants will situate this analysis in the contemporary context and be able to discuss and evaluate the implications and likely impact of changes implied by the election proposals of the new President as well as policy decisions taken during the first months of the new Administration.

Key Questions

Issues to be addressed during the session include:

* How do demographic changes and immigration issues reflect social tensions and raise questions and problems about the quality of life for those concerned?

* How and in what way has the availability of education affected mobility and fostered success and/or failure in America?

* How do social and economic class stratification relate to and affect the quality of life, fairness, well- being and justice in American life?

* In what way does the distribution of wealth, parity of income and availability of employment opportunities affect and contribute to fairness and justice?

* What does the nature and degree of incarceration indicate about justice and the quality of life?

* How have these matters changed and/or evolved over the past seventy years?

* Does the American justice system function fairly and in what way might it benefit from radical change?

* How does the electoral system and congressional representation promote and support or otherwise affect and represent fairness, equality and justice?

* How and in what way are policy proposals and changes by the new administration likely to affect life, justice, health and welfare of Americans?

Program Goals and Impact

* The session’s primary goal is to foster intellectual analysis and discussion between professionals and academics about the factors that have contributed over the last seventy years to the contemporary reality of life and justice in America and which might affect the future.

* University professors from around the world who teach about America will acquire and refine content to convey to their students through active discussions about America and its democratic future .

* By sharing knowledge and expertise, participants will contribute to critical thinking on issues affecting life in contemporary America and suggest priorities and strategies for improvement and progress to fulfill the American promise of a better life for all.

As we examine the last seven decades of America’s progress, problems and challenges, and the promise to itself and the world to provide a good life with fairness and justice, we will try to identify challenges for the future to help fulfill the American Dream and the Promise of America.

For information about becoming a participant, contact Symposium Director Ms. Marty Gecek mgecek@SalzburgGlobal.org

The symposium website and a registration form can be accessed at www.SalzburgGlobal.org/go/ssasa15 Information on designated speakers will be posted there as they are confirmed.

Limited financial aid is available towards the symposium fee of 740 Euro (which includes all expenses in Salzburg, but not travel). One full scholarship will be awarded through the Emory Elliott Scholarship Fund, and one through the Clifton Scholarship Fund.

 

Drawing on huge interest in the upcoming collection Spaces of Surveillance: States and Selves, which is currently in press, this new collection seeks to merge cultural explorations of surveillance with the issue of race. We wish to examine how culture produces or reproduces power relations via the surveillant technologies which have captured the cultural imagination. Through a critical reading of contemporary and historic narratives of race and surveillance, we seek to illustrate the ongoing cultural fascination with technologies of control and surveillance. The current global moment is one  of extreme cultural upheaval; political populism, the ‘alt-right’ and the greatest movement of peoples since World War Two are coupled with the increasing salience of surveillant technologies and regimes. At this juncture in history, with exclusionary policies, increasing racism and growing xenophobia, the matter of race and its representation demand critical attention.

Some would argue that to discuss race is to construct it as a category, to collude in the biological myth of race. If whiteness is an ‘unmarked’ category, as some would suggest, how is surveillance complicit in the marking of race? We seek to examine how media and culture engage with surveillant technologies to represent race, to create a culture of differentiation. We are interested in all forms of surveillance; from wearable tech and health monitoring systems to wide scale population monitoring, biometrics and cybersecurity. We wish to examine all forms of cultural production which engage or have engaged with the topics of race and surveillance in culture; literature, poetry, painting, sculpture, photography, film and TV.

By examining perspectives on the issue of race and its surveillance in popular cultural products, Surveillance, Race, Culture seeks to attend to the politics of representation and the cultural encroachment of surveillance on racial identity. Considering the salience of surveillance in society, we seek to examine the manner in which race is pitted as a critical category of differentiation. We endeavor to look both backwards and forwards, elucidating a timeline of how race has been culturally understood, represented, and surveilled.

We seek original perspectives on the subject of cultural production, both historic and contemporary as well as visions of our cultural future. We are particularly interested in Western and American representations of race and the manner in which it is categorized. From Birth of a Nation (Griffith: 1915) to current divisive political rhetoric, literature, artistic and screen depictions of race and race studies, this collection wishes to explore the manner in which surveillance apparently allows us to see, categorize and measure race in cultural productions.

Topics may include (but are not limited to):

• Racial profiling and surveillance in popular culture

• Surveillance’s part in the production of the racial ‘other’

• 9/11, homeland security and racial monitoring in popular media

• Surveillance of race activists in narratives/biographies

• Screen representations of racial monitoring during migration or warfare

• Film, TV, and documentary narratives of race and surveillance

• Literature, poetry and creative narratives of race and surveillance

• Art which engages in issues of race, surveillance and profiling

• Cultural representations of the NSA’s surveillance of race

• Racialized security surveillance in popular narratives

The editors request that potential contributors send an abstract of no more than 400 words, explaining the scope of their paper, by March 10th. Please provide up to 5 keywords and use the subject line Surveillance, Race, Culture. Please also include a brief biographical note of no more than 300 words.

Contributors will be notified by March 30th. Full papers will be requested on or before July 15th.

Dr Susan Flynn, University of Arts, London. s.flynn@lcc.arts.ac.uk

Dr Antonia Mackay, Oxford Brookes University Oxford. antoniamackay@brookes.ac.uk

Editor: Rubén Cenamor

Traditionally, the relationship between the American male and nature has been that of the dominant and the dominated. From the real-life case of Teddy Roosevelt and his son Kermit to the fictionalized lives of cowboys, pioneers, and other western heroes, men have proved their masculinity by subduing nature to his will and by exploring, penetrating and conquering the ‘virgin land’. This subjugation has led ecofeminists to argue that women and nature share the same history of oppression by men (Gaard 1993).

Postmodernist literature, scholars argue, slowly began to question and problematize this relationship, eventually creating what Stefan Brandt calls “ecomasculinity”. The “eco-man” presents a subversive, more nuanced model of manhood which can embrace non-masculine traits and is also deeply conservationist (Brandt 2015). The works of Annie Proulx and Gretel Ehrlich, just to mention a couple of examples, depict this counter-discourse to the traditional rhetoric of masculine self-affirmation through the exploitation of nature. Indeed, their heroes no longer exalt and pursue hypermasculinity but rather try to find a balance between masculine and feminine qualities while embracing caring and nurturing attitudes towards the environment.

This panel seeks to further explore this new relationship between the American male and nature, and the challenges it poses to our times of economic, ideological and spiritual crisis. What kind of impact can ecomasculinity have in our globalized neoliberal capitalist world? What about gender relationships? How, if at all, can the “eco-man” pave the way to alternative models of masculinity and to more gender egalitarian societies?  

We invite proposals on these topics and welcome other themes related to:

• The potential of ecomasculinities for social changes

• Ecomasculinities and/in relation to natural disasters  

• Ecomasculinities and Feminist theory

• Theoretical approaches to Ecomasculinities

• Transnationalism and Ecomasculinities

• Politics/space/race and Ecomasculinity

• Examples of ecomasculinity prior postmodernism

• Big and small screen representations of ecomasculinity

• Real-life eco-men

This edited volume has received strong interest from the editor of the Ecocritical Theory and Practice series, published by Rowman & Littlefield’s imprint Lexington Books (US).

Proposals (300-400 words) should be send to rubencenamor@ub.edu along with a short bio (150 words) by March 15.  Candidates will receive a notification of acceptance by April 15, 2017. The deadline for first drafts (6,000-8000 words, notes and references included) is September 25, 2017. Final papers are expected by December 18, 2017.

GFF 2017: Realities and World Building

University of Vienna, September 20th-23rd 2017

The creation and experience of “new” worlds is a central appeal of the fantastic. From Middle Earth to variations of the Final Frontier, the fantastic provides a seemingly infinite number of fantastic “worlds” and world concepts. It develops and varies social and cultural systems, ideologies, biological and climatic conditions, cosmologies and different time periods. Its potential and self-conception between the possible and the impossible offer perspectives to nearly every field of research. The plurality and concurrent existence of different, even contradictory concepts of reality is an established topos in cultural and social sciences. In a similar fashion, scientific narratives can simultaneously coexist with fantastic ones within the cultural network of meaning – without creating an existential antagonism between them. The reason for that is not that one of these narratives is true while the other is not, but – following Hayden White, who assumed that scientific and literary narratives have more in common than not – because both of them are fictional. If a fantastic narrative is internally consistent, it is in a Wittgensteinian sense as true as Newton’s laws. This poses an existential problem for the fantastic: if it applies to every consistent narrative, what is the defining difference between fantastic and other narratives?

In our everyday practice, however, we seem to easily distinguish the fantastic from other aspects of reality. How is that possible? How can fantastic worlds emerge within and besides other multiple world-conceptions? What are the functions of fantastic worlds in the construction of reality? In designating texts as fantastic, we explicitly assert their fictitious character. Which practices do we employ to facilitate this designation?

We call narratives fantastic that violate our common reality consensus, thus establishing their counter-reality consensus – in other words, a different world. This is done in different ways, thereby defining fantastic genres: for example, science fiction uses key motives like objects and cultural practices (interstellar travels, wormhole-generators, etc.) for world-building that belong to a realm of conceivable future possibility. While the modern scientific reality consensus does not categorically preclude beaming, it does deny the very possibility of a demon summoning. In order to serve as a foil to the real, the fantastic has to play an ambiguous role: key motives of its multiple worlds have to be recognizable as imaginary, but at the same time at least some of these elements have to be linked with common reality consensus. A typical strategy for achieving this ambiguity is the incorporation of cultural practices that remind us of established perceptions of history, most prominently perhaps the European Middle Ages. Thus, a perceptible distance between the narrative and the recipient’s common reality consensus is established, while utilizing parts of this very consensus to render the narrative comprehensible.

Wolfgang Iser considers the “fictive” to be an intentional act, and the “imaginary” the recipient’s conception of the fictionalization’s effects. World Building is part of every narrative, but as a result of variable cultural contexts, every narrative is involved in different modes of production and perception. The conference aims to emphasize and reflect these very acts of fictionalization used to build fantastic worlds – in different media, and on theoretical as well as methodological levels.

Accepted Keynotes:

Stefan Ekman (University of Gothenburg, Sweden)

Farah Mendlesohn (University of Stafford, UK)

Possible Topics:

• Intermedia (and media-specific) features and indicators of fantastic worlds in film, TV,

literature, (digital) games, etc.

• How does the extradiegetic constitute fantastic worlds and vice versa? Social and cultural

systems, ideologies, biological and climatic conditions, cosmologies, etc.

• World-building methods and practices: reflections on economic and technical resources;

transparent world-building (Making-ofs, exhibitions, interviews, etc.)

• Construction plans: sourcebooks, world editors, Table-Tops, miniatures, dioramas,

LARPs

• We are of course open to further suggestions.

The conference will also feature an “Open Track” for presentations beyond the scope of this CFP.

The GFF awards two stipends to students to help finance traveling costs (250 Euro each). Please indicate if you would like to be considered.

CALL HAS BEEN EXTENDED TO February 28th 2017

Please send short bio & abstracts (500 words max.) to thomas.walach@univie.ac.at