CFP  Jimmy Carter and the ‘Year of the Evangelicals’ Reconsidered
April 6-8, 2017
New Hampshire Institute of Politics, Saint Anselm College
Manchester, New Hampshire

In 1976 Newsweek magazine borrowed a phrase from pollster George Gallup and proclaimed that year the “Year of the Evangelicals.”  Both presidential candidates – Republican Gerald Ford and Democrat Jimmy Carter – claimed to be “born again” Christians, a claim made by one third of all Americans; and significant proportions of Protestants and Catholics told Gallup’s pollsters that the Bible should be taken literally, a marker of conservative evangelical Christianity.  This phenomenon caught journalists by surprise, and they struggled to understand this new segment of the electorate, beginning at the top with the candidacy of Jimmy Carter. The election of 1976 brought evangelicals back into the political arena. While many of these people supported Carter’s candidacy and made the difference in his election, the ways in which they influenced public life quickly extended beyond Carter and the Democratic Party.  It also marked evangelicals’ movement from the margins of intellectual and cultural life into the mainstream. Indeed, they soon became a political and cultural force.

Some forty years later, with financial support from the Henry Luce Foundation, Saint Anselm College and the New Hampshire Institute of Politics in Manchester, New Hampshire, will host a conference in honor of that Newsweek cover story and presidential election. The conference, “Jimmy Carter and ‘The Year of the Evangelicals’ Reconsidered” aims to assess both the scholarly and popular significance of the return to public life of American evangelicals.  While theNewsweek cover story provides the initial starting point, this conference aims to explore the phenomenon of evangelicals and politics more broadly.

Conference organizers seek individual paper proposals or proposals for an entire panel that analyze evangelicalism in light of its contributions to public life both in and since 1976.  In many ways, scholarship on late twentieth-century evangelicalism and the rise of the Religious Right has matured.  But there are still questions to be answered and new interpretations to be offered.  The following research questions point to potential areas for proposals, but this list is not exhaustive and proposals that address other questions or re-imagine conventional interpretations will be welcomed.

First, with the rise of the Religious Right in the late 1970s and 1980s, the progressive evangelicalism in the Newsweek article was relegated to minority status in the political world.  Why is that and what happened to its political influence in the late 20th century?

Second, in the Newsweek story, Foy Valentine, leader of the Southern Baptist Christian Life Commission, called the label “evangelical” a “Yankee” word.  What made southern Protestant Christianity different from the rest of the nation (and why was it not necessarily “evangelical”)?

Third, African Americans are not often included in the category “evangelical” – especially in the political sense that characterized Newsweek’s story. What about African-American evangelicals?  Where do they fit in evangelicalism’s conventional historical narrative?

Fourth, what has been evangelicals’ influence on popular culture and intellectual life since their return to public life in the 1970s?

Fifth, where are we now?  Has evangelicalism’s influence on American politics diminished in the twenty-first century?

Sixth, what about the mainstream press’s treatment of evangelicals and politics?  What impact did the Newsweek cover story and the election of 1976 have on journalists?

Finally, what was the relationship between Catholics and evangelicals during this period?

Individual paper proposals should include a 250-word abstract, a brief (1-page) CV, and contact information (including email address).  Panel proposals should include a 500-word abstract, with brief (1-page) CVs for all participants and contact information for the panel organizer.

Direct proposals and any questions to Andrew Moore (amoore@anselm.edu).

Deadline for submissions is November 15, 2016.

The International Auto/Biography Association

Chapter of the Americas Conference: May 15-17, 2017

Lives Outside the Lines: Gender and Genre in the Americas

A Symposium in Honour of Marlene Kadar

To be held at the Centre for Feminist Research, York University, Toronto.

We invite proposals for the third biennial meeting of IABA Americas that will be held at the Centre for Feminist Research in Toronto with support from the US Fulbright Program. The conference will explore the multiple lines that gendered lives in the Americas cross, both physical borders and intangible boundaries. The conference is dedicated to the celebration of the scholarship of Marlene Kadar, a Canadian theorist and critic whose contributions have dramatically changed the field by pushing the conceptual boundaries of what constitutes life writing and expanding its interdisciplinary methods of study.

The themes suggested below relate to and amplify Kadar’s research interests and are clustered around issues of gender and genre with special attention given to trauma and illness studies, archival methodologies, and transnational themes in the Americas. Potential subjects include, but are not limited to, the following topics:

  • Gender in migration, dislocation, displacement, transit;
  • Gender constructions on and across borders;
  • Transnational and decolonial practices of gender and embodiment;
  • Intersectional interrogations of gender and sexuality with race, class, body size, health, and ability;
  • Fluidity of genders, sexualities, becoming bodies;
  • Bodes in extremis, bodies in pain, medicated bodies, permeable bodies;
  • Creativity and illness; living with life-threatening illness; living with death/dying;
  • End-of-life interview and (auto)pathographic genres;
  • Intimacies of health care biopower;
  • “Traumics” (comics of medical trauma, violence, abuse, and war);
  • Plasticity of life writing;
  • Hybrid forms and practices;
  • Multimedial and multimodal life writing;
  • Emerging genres (Instagram, selfie, I-doc, digital diary, etc.);
  • Secret as a genre, unpublished secrets;
  • Practices of testimony in multiple modes (oral, digital, photographic, film, documentary, writing);
  • Intersections of life writing and the life sciences;
  • Gendering and racializing the archives;
  • Sensorial and affective encounters in the archives;
  • Empathy, sympathy, and compassion;
  • Interdisciplinarity of archival work;
  • Methodological practices related to gender and genre; and,
  • Pedagogical intersections of gender and genre.

Please send 300-word abstracts with brief biographical statements as email attachments to the convenors: Eva C. Karpinski, York University [evakarp@yorku.ca] and Ricia Anne Chansky, University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez [ricia.chansky@upr.edu] by October 31, 2016. Decisions will be made by January 15, 2017. Please be aware that space is limited. Inquiries are welcome.

The IABAA supports presenters’ rights to their own language preferences. While we do ask that abstracts be submitted in English or in English and a second language, we will assist with arranging translation for scholars who would like to present their papers in Spanish, Portuguese, or French.

Eva C. Karpinski is Associate Professor in the School of Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies at York University, Toronto. She edited Pens of Many Colours: A Canadian Reader (3 editions). She is the author of Borrowed Tongues: Life Writing, Migration, and Translation (2012) and co-editor of Trans/Acting Culture, Writing, and Memory (2013). She edited a special issue of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies on “Broken Dialogues.”

Ricia Anne Chansky is Associate Professor of Literature at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez. She is the editor of the journal, a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, and of three books: The Routledge Auto/Biography Studies Reader, Auto/Biography in the Americas: Relational Lives, and Auto/Biography across the Americas: Transnational Themes in Life Writing. She is a Fulbright Specialist in American Studies and the founder of the International Auto/Biography Association – Chapter of the Americas.

Marlene Kadar is a professor in the Department of Humanities and Gender and Women’s Studies at York University, Toronto. She has published extensively in the field of life writing, especially in relation to traumatic historical events, archival lives, and memory studies. Her 1992 essay on life writing as a critical practice is one of the first comprehensive attempts to theorize this genre. She has co-edited four volumes on life writing theory: Tracing the Autobiographical (2005); ARIEL: Life Writing in International Contexts (2008); Photographs, Histories, and Meanings (2009); and Working Memory: Women and Work in World War II (2015). She is the co-editor of Working in Women’s Archives (2001). She is the editor of the Life Writing Series at Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

International Symposium
October 19-20, 2017
École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon (France)
Thoreau from across the pond

Organized by Julien Nègre (ENS de Lyon)
François Specq (ENS de Lyon)
and Laura Dassow Walls (University of Notre Dame)

Guest speakers (confirmed):
–        Professor Branka Arsić (Columbia University)
–        Professor William Rossi (University of Oregon)

In honor of Henry David Thoreau’s 200th birthday in 2017, this conference would like to interrogate the multiplicity of viewpoints from which he is read today. In recent years, Thoreau’s writings have been approached from a variety of perspectives: he has been envisioned as a poet and a philosopher, but also as a political thinker, a scientist of sorts, a surveyor, a lover of nature and an environmentalist. While these different perspectives complement each other to a certain extent, they also reveal how multifaceted his writings are, and how elusive his figure remains. Something resists in his texts, which is probably the surest sign of his ongoing relevance today.
The purpose of this conference is to confront these different readings and explore the issue of how we perceive and understand Thoreau today. The geographical separation between Concord and Lyon invites us to question the distance–temporal, intellectual, theoretical perhaps–between Thoreau and us. What does it mean to read Thoreau from across the pond, that is to say, in this case, from across the Atlantic, but also from the 21st century and from the frame of reference of our own modernity? In a journal entry from June 7, 1851, Thoreau playfully warns: “Keep your distance, do not infringe on the interval between us, and I will pick pick [sic] up lime & lay real terrestrial eggs for you, & let you know by cackling when I have done it.” What is the right “distance” to read Thoreau, then? What sort of theoretical tools, historiographic work of contextualization or biographical sources do we need to find the right “interval”? Thinking about Thoreau from across the pond also invites us to consider his inscription in American culture, both in his own time (through the study of his reception by his contemporaries) and in the way he has been perceived by several different generations of readers.
In 2009, scholars from around the world gathered in Lyon for the “Thoreauvian Modernities” conference, the first Thoreau event ever organized on this side of the Atlantic. That gathering led to important debates on Thoreau’s “modernity,” as evidenced by the multiple and sometimes divergent approaches displayed in the Thoreauvian Modernities volume (University of Georgia Press, 2013). Following up on these debates, the organizers of the present conference are interested in papers that illustrate and confront the variety of theoretical approaches and perspectives on Thoreau’s texts and his life. Participants might consider, but not necessarily limit themselves to the following topics:
–        New approaches to Thoreau’s writings
–        Thoreau’s texts and their inscription within the fields of philosophy, politics, science, environmental studies, etc.
–        Thoreau’s life
–        Thoreau’s network: his friends, relatives, correspondents, etc. and their influence on his thinking;
–        Thoreau’s sources: the documents he used, read, owned, borrowed, annotated, etc.
–        Thoreau’s reception by his contemporaries and until today.

To submit a proposal, please send an abstract (250-300 words) and a short CV to thoreau.lyon2017@ens-lyon.fr by October 1, 2016.

The Terra Foundation for American Art International Essay Prize recognizes excellent scholarship by a non-U.S. scholar in the field of historical American art. Manuscripts should advance the understanding of American art, demonstrating new findings and original perspectives. The prize winner will be given the opportunity to work toward publication in American Art, the Smithsonian American Art Museum’s scholarly journal. He or she will also receive a $1,000 cash award and a travel stipend of up to $3,000 to give a presentation in Washington, D.C., and meet with museum staff and fellows. This prize is supported by funding from the Terra Foundation for American Art.

Ph.D. candidates and above who have not published in American Artpreviously are eligible to participate in the competition. Essays may focus on any aspect of historical (pre-1980) American art and visual culture; however, architecture and film studies are not eligible. Preference will be given to submissions that address American art within a cross-cultural context and offer new ways of thinking about the material. A strong emphasis on visual analysis is encouraged.

Submissions for the 2017 prize must be sent to TerraEssayPrize@si.edu by January 15, 2017. For more information about eligibility and the format for submissions, please visit www.americanart.si.edu/research/awards/terra.

One-day symposium on 21st-century American historical fiction
 
Date of conference: Saturday 18 March 2017
Location: University of Nottingham, UK
Call for papers deadline: 1 December 2016
 
Historical fiction in English constitutes its own enduring tradition but in recent years, it has enjoyed a surge of critical acclaim and commercial popularity, as such scholars as Kate Mitchell and Nicola Parsons have argued. This one-day symposium at the University of Nottingham will explore how recent writers in the United States have engaged with the form. In what sense are American writers reinterpreting the past to produce what Elodie Rousselot has termed “neo-historical fiction”? Which periods are they examining? And why do US writers favor particular historical eras and episodes over others? 
 
Potential topics for papers (lasting no longer than 20 minutes) might include, but are certainly not limited to:
 
•       the retrieval and recuperation of “lost” or hidden histories
•       the creation of a usable past
•       memorialization, commemoration, and fiction as a site of memory
•       fictional treatments of particular historical moments (for instance, specific military conflicts or political events) or decades (e.g. the 1950s)
•       formal experimentation and reinvention across literary genres and subgenres (for example, novels, short stories, graphic narratives, creative nonfiction, counterhistorical texts, detective fiction, the Bildungsroman and so on)
•       time travel and temporal inversion 
•       innovative engagements with earlier forms of historical fiction within and beyond the United States    
 
Please send abstracts of 150 words and a brief biography (50 words) to Ruth Maxey (ruth.maxey@nottingham.ac.uk) by 1 December 2016. 
 
 Successful applicants will be notified by 10 January 2017.

HEMINGWAY IN PARIS

“Paris est une fête” . . . Hemingway’s Moveable Feast

JULY 22-28, 2018

Conference Co-Directors: H. R. Stoneback & Matthew Nickel

Paris Site Coordinators: Alice Mikal Craven & William E. Dow

Host Institution: The American University of Paris

 

Mark your calendars now for what promises to be an amazing conference in Paris, July 22-28, 2018. Paris is Hemingway’s moveable feast. A major concern of the conference directors is to make this a truly international conference. To that end, committees have already been established to ensure the input and participation of French, European, Asian and worldwide Hemingway scholars and aficionados. If you have special knowledge and expertise in the matter of France, or useful French and Parisian contacts, or you would like to serve on a Paris 2018 Conference Committee (or suggest on-site individuals who might serve on such committees), let us know as soon as possible. And please invite and encourage your colleagues and students and friends to be there with us—in Paris, with Hemingway.

Our Host Institution will be The American University of Paris, centrally located in the heart of historic Paris, in the 7th arrondissement near the Seine and the Eiffel Tower, yet far enough from the madding tourist crowd to guarantee an authentic and idyllic Parisian experience for Hemingway conferees. From our home-base academic sessions at AUP to special sessions at The Sorbonne, from a cocktail or dinner bateau mouche boat-ride on the Seine to a dazzling array of other special events now being investigated and considered from among l’embarras des richesses that Paris has to offer—an overabundant embarrassment of riches and choices—we promise that this conference is not to be missed. (And this word from an old Paris hand: don’t be scared by that word “riches”—Paris is inexpensive compared with some of our conference venues and our recommended hotel list in Paris 2018 will be less expensive than most hotels in Oak Park in 2016, Venice in 2014, etc.)

Enthusiasm for the Paris 2018 conference is running high, in the U.S. and abroad. One reason to be in Paris in 2018 is the truly once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to participate in the global commemoration of the First World War Centenary and to do so in Paris, at the heart of such commemorations. Papers and panels on all aspects of Hemingway studies are welcome. Stay tuned. Watch for the CFP coming soon. Follow the news on the Hemingway Society website hemingwaysociety.org.

 

 

 

 

Deadline for submissions: February 1, 2017.

Full name /name of organization: Goodwin College.

Contact email: rlaist@goodwin.edu

In the final week of January, 1977, the ABC miniseries Roots became the most-watched television program of all time. To the surprise of the show’s producers, Roots became not only a ratings windfall, but a cultural phenomenon, articulating an African-American counter-narrative of American history, provoking a dialogue about the legacy of slavery, and presenting African-American characters with a dignity and integrity that differed sharply from the caricatured representations common to television up to that time. In many ways, the response to the show by the media and the general public constitutes the first of many “conversations about race” that have punctuated the Post-Civil Rights era.

On October 6 and 7 of 2017, Goodwin College will host a special conference to mark the 40th anniversary of the original broadcast of Roots. Goodwin College houses a significant repository of Alex Haley’s writings, and it is committed to promoting dialogue about social justice and opportunity for all. We welcome 250-word proposals for conference presentations focused on any aspect of the miniseries, its impact, and its legacy.

Possible topics include but are not limited to:

Media representations of slavery and African-Americans over the last half-century,
The sociological and educational impacts of intergenerational trauma,
Re-viewing Roots within the context of contemporary concerns such as the epidemic of mass-incarceration, the cultural heritage of the Civil War, the Black Lives Matter campaign, etc.,
The power of television as both an agent of change and as upholder of the status quo,
Generic interactions between oral history and novelistic fiction, and between historical iconography and televised melodrama,
The history of attempts to have a public “conversation about race” and their ambiguous outcomes,
Genealogy, naming, and African-American identity,
Approaches to teaching the novel and the miniseries.
In addition to scholarly contributions, we also welcome artwork, creative writing, personal narratives, and multimedia reflections on Roots for inclusion in the conference program.

Please visit the conference website at the following address to submit your proposal:

http://digitalcommons.goodwin.edu/roots/

Or send proposals directly to Randy Laist at rlaist@goodwin.edu.

Deadline for proposals: February 1, 2017

Deadline for submissions: October 1, 2016.

Full name /name of organization: Shawn Higgins /Association for Asian American Studies.

Contact email: shawn.higgins@nmt.edu

AAAS 2017 Special Session CFP (Please share widely).
13-15 April 2017, Portland, OR.

“Ingest with Care: Asian American Bodies Consuming” explores the foods, drinks, supplements, carcinogens, and other matter consciously either consumed or rejected by Asian American bodies. Ideally, this diverse panel will feature scholars of the humanities, social studies, and the sciences.

150-250 word abstract and CV by 1 October 2016; Shawn Higgins (shawn.higgins@nmt.edu).

Deadline for submissions: December 19, 2016.

Full name /name of organization: John Brittingham (Greenville College) and Andrew Marzoni (Georgia Institute of Technology).

Contact email: andrew.marzoni@lmc.gatech.edu

Since the first back-to-the-land movements of the late nineteenth century, summer camps have occupied a unique place in the American cultural imagination. Part coming of age ritual, part sanctuary, part nostalgia, part babysitter, summer camps have expanded from a select few operations to a cornucopia of specialized options in the twenty-first century: sports camp, music camp, nerd camp, fat camp, bible camp, coding camp, cooking camp––with every summer comes new possibilities.

We are seeking a variety of academic essays and nonfiction narratives for a volume titled Notes on Camp. Topics may include a film theory analysis of summer camp movies, an art historical perspective on camp crafts, or a musicologist’s take on “Kumbaya” and the role of summer camp in American folk music. We’d love to hear from writers eager to share their personal experiences as campers, counselors, parents, psychologists, coaches, and educators. Such essays might discuss encounters with the wilderness, organizations such as Boy Scouts of America or Girl Scouts of the USA, camp rivalries and pranks, adolescent romance, appropriation of Native American cultures and traditions, the sociology of the end-of-summer-dance, or even water sports. Ultimately, we are hoping to put together a volume at once touching and humorous, rigorous and anecdotal, bringing together a number of distinct academic disciplines and narrative voices.

Finished essays should be between 3000 and 5000 words in length, with the option of shorter submissions for narrative pieces. Previously unpublished work only, please.

Email 500-word abstracts to John Brittingham (johnbrittingham@gmail.com) and Andrew Marzoni (andrew.marzoni@lmc.gatech.edu) by December 19, 2016. Finished essays will be due early Spring 2017.

 

Deadline for submissions: September 23, 2016

Full name /name of organization: ACLA

Contact email: mmalburn@highpoint.edu

Monsters in Our Midst: Hauntings, Taboos, and Terror in Global Literature

Organizer: Meredith Malburne-Wade

Co-Organizer: Ashley Reed

Co-Organizer: Megan Goodwin

In his essay on the unheimlich, Freud proposed that the uncanny is “something which ought to have remained hidden but has come to light.” Toni Morrison foregrounds the specter of race haunting the American literary imagination when she asks, “are there ghosts in the machine?” Barbara Creed’s engagement of Kristeva suggests that “abjection, as a source of horror, works within patriarchal societies, as a means of separating the human from the non-human.” Edward Ingebretsen’s answer to the question “why does one make a monster?” is chilling: “to watch it die, of course.”

The ogres of our imagination are raced, gendered, classed, and embodied. Societies define themselves at the threshold of repulsion. The stories we tell ourselves about what we fear reveal who we are, what we want, and what we cannot or will not tolerate. How do cultures narrate unspeakable things? How may literature help us approach—or repel—the unthinkable? Can our specters be benevolent, or can history only haunt us?

Building on these observations and inquiries, this seminar invites explorations of monstrosity, hauntings, abjection, and interstitial embodiment in global literature. We invite papers on both research and pedagogy, including the challenges of teaching monstrous or haunted works. Open to texts from or situated around the world, we look forward to discussing the history of terror, taboos, and the “ghosts in the machine,” as well as the ways in which literature hides or exposes them. ACLA will be held at Utrecht University in Utrecht, the Netherlands, July 6-9 2017. Paper proposals must be submitted by September 23. ACLA seminars run a bit differently: each seminar meets over 2-3 days and all participants should plan to attend all 2-3 days of the seminar to encourage conversation about and between individual papers. Questions can be addressed to Meredith Malburne-Wade at mmalburn@highpoint.edu