Deadline for submissions: March 15, 2017
Full name / name of organization: University of Wrocław and École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
Contact email: moontauk@gmail.com
In 1968, Donald Barthelme had one of his narrators declare: “Fragments are the only forms I trust.” The last decades have brought a number of acclaimed novels in Britain and the US that illustrate their authors’ interest in fragmentary structures. David Mitchell constructed Cloud Atlas (2005) out of six stories with different settings, characters and generic features. David Markson produced an 800-page-long tetralogy, culminating in The Last Novel (2007), which juxtaposes several thousand succinct anecdotes and quotations with metafictional references to the elusive authorial figure. The year 2014 saw the publication of three notable fragmentary novels: Will Eaves’s The Absent Therapist – an amalgam of the voices of 150 speakers, Richard McGuire’s Here – a graphic novel created out of over 150 images (non-chronologically arranged) of the same location throughout several million years, and Jenny Offill’s Dept. of Speculation – an account of a marriage crisis narrated with the use of several hundred loosely connected paragraphs. As the example of Cloud Atlas – alongside those of Zadie Smith’s NW, Anne Enright’s The Green Road and, most recently, Julian Barnes’s The Noise of Time – demonstrates, fragmentation is not only the domain of niche, “experimental” writing.

Although it may have arguably earlier origins, fragmentation has been a vital aspect of twentieth- and twenty-first-century literature. Several canonical novels of modernism – such as Ulysses and The Waves – could be classified as fragmentary, since they are constructed in parts that refuse to cohere, and as Gabriel Josipovici suggested, the fragmented form of modernist works may be seen as a response to the human need to escape linearity. More radical examples of fragmented novels were written in the 1960s and 70s by authors sometimes associated with postmodernism: J.G. Ballard, John Barth, Donald Barthelme, Robert Coover, B.S. Johnson and Gabriel Josipovici, among others. Despite the fact that many renowned novelists have contributed to fragmentary writing, the term itself is rarely used in Anglophone criticism. The aim of our conference is to postulate a renewed engagement with fragmentary literature. We are particularly interested in contemporary writing and invite papers that approach chosen aspects of fragmentation in British and American fiction published over the last five decades (post-1966). We wish to examine the typical ingredients of the fragmentary mode (such as enumeration, non-linearity and the unconventional layout of the page), the mechanics of organising the disparate parts, and the various rationales for writing in fragments.

Proposals may consider but are not limited to:

the extent to which fragmentation in contemporary literature borrows from modernist (or postmodernist) experiments and the degree to which it creates its own aesthetics,
the correspondence between literary fragmentation and the social, political and technological reality of the contemporary world (e.g., Twitter fiction),
the influence of various art forms (particularly the visual arts and cinema) on literary fragmentation (e.g., Joseph Frank’s notion of “spatial form” and Sharon Spencer’s conception of the “architectonic novel”),
the fragmentation of a single monolithic reassuring voice into a myriad of voices,
the physical fragmentation of the page,
card-shuffle texts,
forking-path narratives,
novels built out of potentially self-contained parts (blurring the distinction between the novel and the collection of short stories),
generic eclecticism and the aesthetics of mash-up,
collage-like works, altered fictions and other examples of appropriation.
Keynote speakers:

Dr Alison Gibbons – Senior Lecturer at Sheffield Hallam University, author of Mark Z. Danielewski, Multimodality, Cognition, and Experimental Literature (2014) and co-editor of The Routledge Companion to Experimental Literature (2014).

Dr Grzegorz Maziarczyk – Assistant Professor of English and American Literature at John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, author of The Narratee in Contemporary British Fiction (2005) and The Novel as Book: Textual Materiality in Contemporary Fiction in English (2013).

Prof. Merritt Moseley – editor of four volumes on British and Irish Novelists Since 1960, one on Booker Prize-Winners and one on the academic novel, and the author of monographs on David Lodge, Kingsley Amis, Julian Barnes, Michael Frayn, Pat Barker andJonathan Coe. He was a Professor of Literature at the University of North Carolina at Asheville in the United States.

Proposals (300-400 words), together with a biographical note, should be sent to Wojciech Drąg (moontauk@gmail.com) and Vanessa Guignery (vanessaguignery@wanadoo.fr) by 15 March 2017.

Conference fee: 75 euros

Conference website: http://ensconferences.vanessaguignery.com/

Deadline for submissions: January 28, 2017
Full name / name of organization: Association for the Advancement of Scholarship and Teaching of the Medieval in Popular Culture
Contact email: medievalinpopularculture@gmail.com
CALL FOR PAPERS: THE MEDIEVAL IN AMERICAN POPULAR CULTURE

SESSION PROPOSED FOR 2017 ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE AMERICAN LITERATURE ASSOCIATION

TO BE HELD AT THE WESTIN COPLEY PLACE, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS FROM 25 TO 28 MAY 2017

PAPER PROPOSALS DUE BY 28 JANUARY 2017

The Medieval in American Popular Culture:

Reflections in Commemoration of the 80th Anniversary of Prince Valiant

The comic strip Prince Valiant in the Days of King Arthur was launched in 1937 and continues to be produced to this day. Begun by illustrator Hal Foster and now under the direction of writer Mark Schultz and artist Thomas Yeates, Prince Valiant celebrates its eightieth anniversary in 2017. This is a significant achievement for a work of popular medievalism. In recognition of this milestone, the Association for the Advancement of Scholarship and Teaching of the Medieval in Popular Culture seeks papers that explore the appeal (either in the United States or abroad) of the strip and its characters and/or the significance of other works of American medievalism both in the past and in the world today. The session is being submitted for consideration at the 2017 meeting of the American Literature Association to be held in Boston, Massachusetts, from 25-28 May 2017.

We are especially interested in proposals that respond to one of more of the following questions:

Why is the medieval popular in the United States, a nation with no physical connections to the medieval past?
What is the continued appeal of the medieval to Americans?
Do Americans do different things with medieval material compared to their contemporaries around the globe?
How have Americans’ view of the medieval changed over time?
Why do some forms of American-made medievalism endure while others are forgotten?
How well do American-made medievalisms translate into other media and/or cultural settings?

Please submit proposals to the organizers at medievalinpopularculture@gmail.com no later than 28 January 2017. Please use “Medieval in American Popular Culture” as your subject line. A complete proposal should include the following: your complete contact information, a clear and useful title of your paper, an abstract of your paper (approximately 250 to 600 words), a brief biographical statement explaining your academic status and authority to speak about your proposed topic, and a note on any audio/visual requirements.

Final papers should be delivered between 15 and 20 minutes, depending on the number of presenters. Potential presenters are reminded that the rules of the conference allow individuals to present only one paper at the annual meeting.

Further details on the Association for the Advancement of Scholarship and Teaching of the Medieval in Popular Culture can found at http://medievalinpopularculture.blogspot.com.

Additional information about the conference and the American Literature Association can be found at http://americanliteratureassociation.org/.

Deadline for submissions: January 22, 2017
Full name / name of organization: John Whalen-Bridge, National University of Singapore
Contact email: ellwbj@nus.edu.sg
Deadline for submissions: Sunday, January 22, 2017

There is place for one or two panel on the work of GEORGE SAUNDERS for the American Literature Association Conference to be held at the 2017 ALA Conference in Boston, May 25-28, 2017. Any and all approaches to the work will of interest.

Deadline for submissions: January 15, 2017
Full name / name of organization: Annual Conference of the French Association of American Studies (Strasbourg, 6-9 June 2017)
Contact email: cbourhis-mariotti@univ-paris8.fr
Call for Papers for a Panel on Pursuing Happiness in African American Slave Narratives at the 2017 Association française d’études américaines (AFEA) / French Association of American Studies Annual Conference (Strasbourg, 6-9 June)

What could be more foreign to the institution of slavery than the notion of happiness? Such was what Frederick Douglass implied when he wrote about his time on William Freeland’s farm in his second autobiography, My Bondage and My Freedom (1855) : “For much of the happiness—or absence of misery—with which I passed this year with Mr. Freeland, I am indebted to the genial temper and ardent friendship of my brother slaves.” For want of anything better, “absence of misery” was what the slave could yearn for in an oppressive and brutal system based on the exploitation of man by man. If slaves worked for someone’s happiness, it was that of the white master, as noted by Thomas Jefferson, probably the most famous slaveholder in American history (see Lucia Stanton, “Those Who Labor for My Happiness”: Slavery at Thomas Jefferson’s Monticello, 2012).
Yet this panel seeks to uncover and address the “pursuit of happiness” in African American slave narratives. Even though African American slaves, since the origins of the American nation, had been placed at the margins of mankind, and therefore deprived of the inalienable rights—“freedom” and “the pursuit of happiness” in particular—listed in the Declaration of Independence, they were able to embrace the revolutionary ideals and the principles of liberty and equality embedded in the Declaration as their own best hope for freedom and/or better treatment: “And I believed then, as I believe now,” Henry Bibb wrote, “that every man has a right to liberty and the pursuit of happiness” (Narrative of the Life and Adventures of Henry Bibb, an American Slave, 1849). Frederick Douglass, Solomon Northup (Twelve Years a Slave,1853), and William and Ellen Craft (Running a Thousand Miles for Freedom, 1860), among others, also quoted the Declaration of Independence in their narratives. It seems therefore appropriate to examine the different forms this pursuit of happiness could take. Running away, a clear declaration of independence from the master, made it possible for the slaves to pursue their political and social happiness in the free States of the North or beyond the confines of the United States (in the Western territories, in Canada, in the British Isles or other European countries, in the British West Indies, in Haiti or Liberia). For the slave more than anyone else, liberty and the pursuit of happiness were closely intertwined. The search for relative happiness could also be one of the goals pursued by the slaves who did not flee, as Douglass suggested in the aforementioned quotation; solidarity between “brother slaves,” family life, self-fulfillment in the clandestine study of reading and writing were all forms of resistance and expression of slaves’ pursuit of their own happiness—which was nothing like the cheerful contentment that whites perceived in the slaves’ songs they wrongfully considered “as evidence of their . . . happiness” (Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, 1845).
We thus invite participants to consider these various conceptions of happiness in slave narratives. This panel will feature papers on classic slave narratives as well as on alternative sources. Recent scholarship has emphasized that slave testimonies took many forms beyond that of the self-written, separately published, book-length narrative, so presenters are encouraged to address slave testimony from a broad range of sources, including traditional archives, Works Progress Administration (WPA) interviews, newspapers, diaries or memoirs, short stories published in the press, legal documents, petitions, etc., to better understand what happiness might have meant for the men and women who labored under the yoke of slavery. We encourage papers that draw from diverse fields including but not limited to: African American studies, literature, history, civilization and/or cultural studies.

For consideration for this panel, please submit an abstract (250 words) and a brief bio to both Claire Bourhis-Mariotti (cbourhis-mariotti@univ-paris8.fr) and Michaël Roy (michael.roy@u-paris10.fr) by January 15, 2017.

Deadline for submissions: January 25, 2017
Full name / name of organization: Paul Laurence Dunbar Society
Contact email: tmorgan2@udayton.edu
The Paul Laurence Dunbar Society will sponsor a session at the American Literature Association Conference in Boston, MA on May 25-28, 2017. Papers on any aspect of Dunbar’s career, or that focus on any part of his literary output: poetry, novels, short stories, musical theater, correspondence, or essays. Proposals on teaching Dunbar and on Dunbar’s relationships—both personal and professional—with other authors, editors, critics, or related historical figures are especially welcome.

Please e-mail abstracts by January 25, 2016 to tmorgan2@udayton.edu.

Event: 05/25/2017 – 05/28/2017
Abstract: 01/20/2017
Location: Boston, MA
Organization: American Literature Association

ALA 2017: Gwendolyn Brooks at 100

In “Gwendolyn Brooks at 73,” Haki Madhubuti compared Brooks’s mind to “a tornado redefining the landscape.” The landscape of contemporary literature has been changed by her poems: “poems with muscle and sinew, poems that weren’t afraid to take the language and revamp it, twist it and energize it so that it shimmied and dashed and lingered,” in the words of Rita Dove. At least two new collections—Quraysh Ali Lansana and Sandra Jackson-Opoku’s Revise the Psalm, and Peter Kahn, Ravi Shankar, and Patricia Smith’s The Golden Shovel Anthology—will celebrate her centennial in 2017.

This proposed ALA session is also in honor of Brooks’s June 2017 centennial; it seeks papers on any aspect of Brooks’s writing and career. Talks that reassess her legacy are especially welcome: possible topics might include her influence on recent poetry, or recent poetry’s tributes to her; her recordings, notebooks, or manuscripts; or her poetry in the 2017 classroom.

To propose a paper, please send a 250-word abstract, a note on any a/v needs, and a short bio to Calista McRae (mcrae@njit.edu), no later than January 20, 2017. The panel and its accepted abstracts will then be submitted to the ALA for review. More information about the ALA’s annual conference is available at <http://americanliteratureassociation.org/ala-conferences/ala-annual-conference/general-call-for-papers/>

Event: 10/31/2017
Abstract: 01/31/2017
Location: Uk & Sweden
Organization: Staffordshire University & University of Gothenburg

The Playful Undead and Video Games: Critical Analyses of Zombies and Gameplay. Routledge Advances in Game Studies

Deadline for submissions:October 31, 2017
Full name / name of organisation: Steve Webley/Staffordshire University UK & Peter Zackariasson/ University of Gothenburg.
Contact email:s.j.webley@staffs.ac.uk
The Playful Undead and Video Games: Critical Analyses of Zombies and Gameplay. Routledge Advances in Game Studies

The Playful Undead and Video Games

Critical Analyses of Zombies and Gameplay – abstract due date 31/Jan/2017

Please see link below for further details:

https://www.academia.edu/30084636/Call_for_chapters_-_The_Playful_Undead…

The zombie has had a glorious evolutionary journey. From its humble beginnings in early cinema, where it was portrayed as a somnambulistic Haitian drone, it has evolved into a diseased cadaverous cannibal that has managed to infect all forms of contemporary media and take centre stage in popular culture. The turbulent decade of the 1960s saw the Haitian zombie reinvented and radically politicized by the independent filmmaker George A. Romero. Over the following decade the zombie became a key component in politicizing the horror genre itself. Once considered as puerile teenage entertainment, horror was to become a serious tool for social commentary. With the growth of consumerism and later Cold War narratives the zombie became an ideological entity in its own right, animating the horror genre as a mythic form of social critique, and creating the ideologically charged post-apocalyptic survival space onto which audiences projected their desires, fantasies, and fears.

Since the early 2000s and the beginnings of the war on terror the zombie has continued to evolve and grow in popularity. Its presence can today be observed across the mediascape, from literature and graphic novels, to film and television series, to art and music, to video games. In fact, it is hard to avoid a video game that somehow includes a zombie. They dominate all gaming markets from app store based mobile and casual games, through indie titles and fan-made mods, to AAA productions. The zombie has become a video game enemy par excellence, appearing in such dedicated franchises as Resident Evil or in hugely popular downloadable content and add-ons to games such as ‘Nazi Zombies mode’ for Call of Duty. Moreover, even games that are not overtly of the zombie apocalypse canon contain both antagonists and protagonists that can effectively be labelled Undead. Titles as diverse as World of Warcraft or the Fallout franchise utilize the zombie and its undead tropes to create deep and meaningful characters and interactive experiences for players to indulge their fantasies.

Building on the cultural fascination with zombies this book will offer different ways to understand the roles of zombies in video games: Johan Huizinga (1938) posited that ‘… All play means something…!’ So we ask what can a focus on play and interactivity bring to the growing corpus of work developed on zombies in film and other media? Why the fascination? What practices have evolved? How and why are zombie based games designed and developed? What are the consequences? What does it mean to participate in an interactive zombie apocalypse? What does it mean to play with, or as, the undead?

This call for chapters will consider contributions from a wide set of academic disciplines, for example: economics, cultural theory, sociological studies, social psychology, psychology, politics, business, design, arts, history, philosophy, literature, and film. Today the study of zombies as a topic within many of these disciplines has become popular, resulting in articles, chapters and books. This book will build on the existing interest that is dispersed into different outputs, exploring this phenomenon in a multidisciplinary Routledge Advances in Game Studies publication.

Format

Please submit one page abstract (500-600 words), plus references. In this abstract it is important that you 1) highlight your focus on zombies and video games, 2) draw out your theoretical framework you plan to apply, and 3) state possible contribution made in the chapter. In addition to the abstract we ask you to submit a short bio, including key publications and academic discipline/school. Expected length of final chapter, 5000-6000 words.

Time plan 2017

January 31 – Deadline abstract

April 30 – Deadline chapter, first draft

May – Workshop (planned for Staffordshire or Gothenburg)

August 30 – Deadline chapter, second draft

October 31 – Deadline, final chapter

Editors

Stephen J. Webley, Staffordshire University, S.J.Webley@staffs.ac.uk

Peter Zackariasson, University of Gothenburg, peter.zackariasson@gu.se

Please see link below:

https://www.academia.edu/30084636/Call_for_chapters_-_The_Playful_Undead…

 

Deadline for submissions: February 1, 2017
Full name / name of organization: The Carson McCullers Society
Contact email: alison.bertolini@ndsu.edu
The Carson McCullers Society invites submissions for an annual scholarly Prize for Outstanding Conference Paper, to be awarded to an essay on the life and work of Carson McCullers presented at a conference in the past year. Entries should provide evidence that the paper was presented at a regional, national, or international academic conference during the previous calendar year (January to December 2016) and that the winner is eligible for the award as an active member of the Society. See the Society’s website at https://carsonmccullerssociety.wordpress.com/ for membership information. Submissions are welcome from graduate students and all levels of scholars. Judging will be a blind process, and the award carries a $100 honorarium. Please send submissions to Carson McCullers Society President Alison Graham-Bertolini (alison.bertolini@ndsu.edu) by February 1, 2017. The winner will be announced in early March.

Deadline for submissions: January 11, 2017
Full name / name of organization: Modernist Studies Association Conference, Amsterdam, August 10-13, 2017
Contact email: geoffrey.bender@cortland.edu
This panel seeks papers on American modernist poetry that address the current debate among new materialist/speculative realist scholars on the ontological status of the thing itself by considering modernism’s approach to a thing’s multiplicity—specifically, its irreducibility to a single set of definitions or characteristics that ground it ontologically.

We situate our conversation within the broader scholarly trend that has moved against the seemingly ubiquitous truism that the world as humans understand it is socially constructed. Theorists such as Graham Harman, Timothy Morton, and Jane Bennett, who are allied to the “nonhuman turn,” have argued, instead, that the social constructionist frame of understanding, while it has no doubt done crucial work in the human realm, nevertheless relies on the problematic assumption of human exceptionalism. With the aim of decentering the human, these scholars have refocused intellectual attention on the vast array of objects that populate and inform human and nonhuman worlds.

Yet while many can agree on the urgency of this decentering move for its power to prod us beyond exceptionalist privilege, the question of how objects—human and otherwise—can best be defined remains hotly debated. Speculative realists, like Harman and Morton, have frequently suggested that objects essentially exist in isolation from one another and are themselves the key mystery to be explored. Others, like Bennett, have argued that the existence of any object is dependent upon its relationality with other objects via networks, systems, or assemblages. The divide between theoretical positions remains, at this point, fairly unbridgeable. How can modernism—specifically, close attention to the thingly lyric object in American modernist poetry—move this debate forward?

Please send a 300-word abstract and CV to session organizers Geoff Bender, SUNY Cortland (geoffrey.bender@cortland.edu), and Rasmus Simonsen, Copenhagen School of Design and Technology (rasi@kea.dk), by Wednesday, January 11, 2017.

Deadline for submissions: January 20, 2017
Full name / name of organization: Graduate English Organization University of Maryland College Park
Contact email: conference.geo@gmail.com
DEADLINE EXTENDED!

Call for Papers: 10th Annual Graduate English Organization Conference

“Worked Up: Labor, Literature, and Culture”

Department of English

University of Maryland, College Park

March 18th, 2017

As questions of unionization, solidarity, precarity, and capital reverberate throughout our academic communities, this conference asks how an historical consideration of labor can invigorate our work as literary scholars today. We might map our present moment through histories of labor that navigate the legacy of slavery, colonization, indentured servitude, guild labor, convict labor, undocumented labor, and the gendered spheres of public and private work. Literary inquiry can trace genealogies of labor—how writings register continuities and ruptures in the way we regulate, politicize, and imagine work over time. Writers as varied as Shakespeare, Marx and Engels, Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Zora Neale Hurston, John Steinbeck, and Jacques Rancière illustrate that labor is constantly being reimagined and repurposed. We thus invite you to explore work and labor as not only nouns but verbs: what it means “to work,” and what is a “work,” as both an art object and the outcome of labor. These terms invite questions about power, property, and subjectivity that engage many interpretive frameworks like feminist theory, Marxist criticism, critical race studies, disability studies, and digital humanities. We imagine this conference to be, in part, self-reflexive: a space for us to think about our work as scholars in academic communities.

We aim for “work” and “labor” to broadly encompass not only questions of material production, but also create opportunities to consider representations of work across boundaries of race, sexuality, gender, class, nation, and form. How do texts work, what do they do? What constitutes the labor of an author or reader? How are bodies transformed by or in the service of labor? How do we account for domestic, racialized, emotional, nonhuman, and collaborative labor? What histories have we traced for these forms of labor, and what futures might we imagine?

We welcome MA, MFA, and PhD students to submit a diversity of “works” to our spring conference: critical presentations, collaborative projects, craft essays, creative work in fiction, poetry, drama, dance, arts, and film. Topics of potential essays can include, but are not limited to:

Representations of Labor

○ Commodified or laboring bodies

○ Dis/ability

○ Invisible labor

○ Digital labor

○ Sex work and transgressive labor

● Global and transnational mappings of work

○ Representations of migrant and displaced labor

○ The work of translation

○ The work of (de)colonization

○ Hemispheric and transatlantic literary traditions

○ The circulation of trade, knowledge, and texts

● Literary Labor

○ The political work of aesthetics and poetics

○ Fetishization, lack, and surplus desire

○ The work of authors, publishers, printers, and readers

○ Ideology and labor

○ Issues of craft and the creative process

● Labor and the University

○ Models of labor in academia

○ Pedagogy as labor and ethics

○ Intellectual labor

○ The work of the Humanities

○ Creative writing within the university

Please submit proposals for fifteen-minute presentations. Panel submissions (3-4 participants) are highly encouraged, as are other collaborative projects. Proposals for papers or panels should be 300-word abstracts. Proposals for creative work should be a short sample from an original composition or a description of the intended work. Please include your full name and email address.

Abstracts are due Friday, January 20th, 2017 and should be e-mailed to conference.geo@gmail.com

Website: http://workedupconference.weebly.com

Facebook: GEO Conference 2017: Worked Up

Twitter: UMD GEO Conference @workedup2017